Facebook Slider
Get News Alerts!
Monday, 14 July 2014 06:03

Economic Racism

March on Washington, August 28, 1963, shows civil rights leaders and union leaders. More than 50 years later, African Americans still have not achieved economic equality. (Image<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American#mediaviewer/File:March_on_washington_Aug_28_1963.jpg" target="_blank"> via Wikipedia</a>)March on Washington, August 28, 1963, shows civil rights leaders and union leaders. More than 50 years later, African Americans still face economic discrimination. (Image via Wikipedia)PAUL BUCHHEIT FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

On October 26, 1934 Claude Neal, a black man accused of murdering a young white woman in Jackson County, Florida, was dragged from his jail cell to be lynched. The event was rushed into the afternoon newspapers. When an unruly crowd of several thousand people gathered for the spectacle, the six men in the lynching party got nervous and decided to drive Neal to a secluded spot in the woods. There they tortured him in ways that seem impossible for a human being to imagine.

America can rightfully feel better about itself now, having gone beyond such detestable acts of savagery against fellow human beings. But the assault on people deemed inferior continues in another way. Instead of a single shocking act of physical brutality, it is a less visible means of drawn-out terror that destroys dignity and livelihood and slowly breaks down the body. So insidious is this modern form of economic subjugation that many whites barely seem to notice people of color being dragged to the bottom of one of the most unequal societies in the history of the world.

EUGENE ROBINSON ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aaaMexicoBorder(Photo: Nofx221984)There's no objective need for President Obama to visit the Texas-Mexico border and see the immigration crisis first-hand, but he shouldn't have claimed that "I'm not interested in photo ops."

The line about photo ops was so absurd that it's a good thing he wasn't under oath. Every president since Abraham Lincoln has been interested in photo ops. Posing for the cameras amid artfully chosen people and props is something presidents do every day. Obama is very good at it, and there are times when he actually gives the impression that he enjoys it.

Not all photo ops are created equal, though. It's easy to understand why Obama might dig in his heels over a trip to the border that would do nothing but give a false impression. Pictures of the president among a group of Central American children -- some of the tens of thousands who have entered the country without papers in recent months -- would suggest that our dysfunctional government is serious about addressing what has become a humanitarian crisis. Sadly, this is not true.

Reckless loudmouths such as Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who blast Obama for "lawlessness" on immigration, are pretending not to understand that the flood of unaccompanied children is primarily caused by Obama's adherence to the law.

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

trickled453(Photo: David_Shankbone)

David Cay Johnston, a renowned economic journalist covering tax issues, recently asserted that approximately $6.6 trillion in income for US earners has been lost since 2000. It just disappeared.

Why did it vanish? Here is how Johnston explains it in a July 9 Al Jazeera article:

I calculated that enormous figure by comparing the average income Americans reported on their 2000 tax returns with what they reported each year for 2001 through 2012, adjusting for inflation and the growing population. Add up the income for 12 years and it turns out to be $6.6 trillion less than if we had maintained the prosperity of 2000 for a growing population.

Why use 2000 as a benchmark? Well, first off, it marks the end of one era and the start of another. More important, that very good year economically was when George W. Bush, running for president, said American prosperity would get even better if he was elected and his tax cuts — key aspects of which he kept secret until after the election — would ensure American prosperity.

The results: The prosperity of the prior decade was lost. Job growth fell far behind population growth. The median wage (half make more, half less) has been mired since 1998 at a bit more than $500 per week. 

So how does this impact taxpayers overall?

STEVEN JONAS MD, MPH FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aaaCheneyII(Photo: Cherie A. Thurlby)In Part 1 of this two-part series, I briefly reviewed what are perhaps the four most significant elements of the "Cheney Legacy:" the War on Afghanistan, the War on Iraq, the principle that Presidents can violate the Constitution at their pleasure as long as they claim to do so "in the interests of national security" (in Cheney's case through the establishment of the use of torture as national policy such use violates Article VI), and also most important, the attempt to establish Permanent War or at least the Permanent Preparation for Permanent War as the central element of US government policy.

There are certainly other elements in the "Cheney Legacy." Not particularly in order of importance, one could start the list with the "outing" of the former CIA agent Valerie Plame. This was done in apparent retaliation for the revelation by her husband, Joseph Wilson, that the Nigeria-"Yellow Cake-Saddam Hussein story was a complete fabrication. Committing such an act violated several laws, but of course Cheney hid behind subordinates like "Scooter" Libby and was never held to account for his action. The continued use of the 9/11 tragedy to promote fear over the whole country. In his current attack on President Obama Cheney is specifically use fear-mongering as a central element in that attack.

Then there are the current top-three GOP-termed "scandals:" the "IRS," the VA (which is a scandal, but just not how the GOP defines the term), and of course "Benghazi." The three attacks have in common the use of lies and distortions designed to attack the opposition political party, not to find any solutions to the problems raised. Finally there is the Cheney principle of the Privatization of Government, including or perhaps beginning with the military and intelligence services. Any way that traditional government can be turned to enable profit-making by the private sector is, in Cheney's eyes a good thing. One of the ironies of that policy is that if Edward Snowden had remained as a government employee rather than working for a private intelligence contractor, it is possible that he might have a) not decided to make the revelations that he has, and b) might not have had the opportunity to do so.

JACQUELINE MARCUS FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aaaFirstAmendmentZone(Photo: Brandt Luke Zorn)While Americans were watching fireworks explode on the 4th, and laboring under the sad delusion that the United States is the land of the free and the brave, I was thinking about the recent Supreme Court ruling on the Massachusetts’ abortion buffer zone law and how some people are free to petition their grievances while anti-war demonstrators, Occupy Wall Street protesters, and environmentalists are either locked away behind chain-link cages designated “free speech zones”, or they’re violently assaulted by the police and thrown in jail. 

Recently, the Supreme Court unanimously struck down Massachusetts’ abortion buffer zone law, ruling in favor of anti-abortion protesters who argued that 35 feet away from clinic entrances is a violation of their freedom of speech. The decision rolls back a proactive policy intended to protect women’s access to reproductive health care in the face of persistent harassment and intimidation from abortion opponents.

As reporters have pointed out, buffer zones are not entirely unusual policies. “There are already buffer zones around funerals and polling places,” explained Tara Culp-Ressler at ThinkProgress.  “Ironically, the Supreme Court itself has a large buffer zone around it to prevent protesters from picketing on its 252-by-98-foot plaza, requiring demonstrations to take place on the sidewalk.” 

And let’s not forget the largest buffer zone of all: The White House, which is more like a military fortress than the People’s House.  

On closer inspection of the ruling, it appears that there is a catchword that can be applied to defend protesters, should protesters want to get right in the face of their adversaries; and that word is “counseling” vs. “picketing or protesting.”

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

hobbyconta(Photo: Fibonacci Blue)

The Hobby Lobby ruling is just one of an avalanche of Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions in which the right wing has legislated from the bench. Forget about the largely fictional concept of a "liberal activist bench"; if you can find such an ongoing entity, please respond in the comments section. 

The reality is that the 5-4 right-wing, pro-corporate-personhood SCOTUS is masterful at defying Congress and the White House and rewriting laws to suit a partisan agenda, including socially conservative goals. BuzzFlash posted a commentary a few days ago about the absurdity of bestowing religious beliefs on a company, for example.

To put this in context, when Antonin Scalia argued for striking down provisions in the Voting Rights Act (which had just been overwhelmingly reapproved by both houses of Congress), he declared in 2013: "This is not the kind of question you can leave to Congress." What he means, of course, is that a 5-4 majority on SCOTUS has turned it into a de facto legislative body that determines US law by a total of five votes, on behalf of a nation of more than 300 million people.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is joining other Democratic senators in support of the Protect Women's Health from Corporate Interference Act. In an email, Warren described the bill:

The bill reverses the Supreme Court's decision by making it clear that employers cannot deny access to any of the health benefits required by the ACA – not immunizations, not blood transfusions, not HIV treatments, and not birth control – while preserving reasonable accommodations for religiously exempt employers [that would mean actual religions, such as the Catholic Church]

ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aaaRepLewis(Photo: Rep. John Lewis (D-GA))Ah, 1961. The year — certain aspects of it, anyway — are almost impossible to remember. "Whites only" bathrooms, for instance.

U.S. Rep. John Lewis, legendary civil rights leader and crosser of lines, recently tweeted an ancient mugshot memorializing his arrest that year for using a "whites only" bathroom in Mississippi and, in the process, amping up outrage against Jim Crow segregation in the South and intensifying the civil rights movement's global resonance.

He was charged with disorderly conduct and spent 37 days at the Parchman Penitentiary. How difficult it is to fathom such smug, legally sanctified certainty. It all seems so long ago . . . those days when the people who ran things were so wrong.

I say this facetiously, of course.

The emergence of this mugshot from 53 years ago, and the memories of a long-gone era that unavoidably accompany it, somehow speaks volumes to the numerous movements for change that are simmering today. One reason is because the civil rights movement of the 1960s was actually successful. It turned the country around. It undid every last legal and moral justification that held together a whites-only Old South, and it seriously undermined much of the legally ensconced racism of the North.

No, it didn't end racism per se, which regrouped "legally" around a bloated prison-industrial complex, but it woke the nation up and created an enduring legacy of nonviolent, human-rights-based change. It set a standard for what's possible, at the same time exposing the vicious hatred, masquerading as moral sanctity, which held together the existing social order.

Pope Francis. (Photo:<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/catholicism/8723849140/in/photolist-ehMqqt-ehNao2-ehTiBA-ehNvAH-ehUbgU-ehNnC6-ehT9Jq-ehNbSi-ehN2Ne-ehU1q5-ehMvKr-ehTE5Q-ehT5iS-ehTMeC-ehTGrJ-ehTzr5-ec7Aoq-ehN9wT-ehTkJb-ehMMXR-ehMyMa-ehUotb-ehTpxd-ehTkx3-ehU4iu-ehN7Uk-ehTPgC-ehTACL-ehTbVf-ehTut1-ehNxH8-ehNwgP-ehTX35-ehTgKm-ehN8UZ-ehUer1-ehTy9q-ehTJ3W-ehToom-ehMFBT-ehN1UR-ehMSFr-ehTHpS-ehNz92-ehUaK7-ehNfNk-ehNqmv-ehNcDK-ec1TFn-ehTiSG" target="_blank"> Catholic Church England and Wales / Flickr</a>)Pope Francis. (Photo: Catholic Church England and Wales / Flickr)ECOWATCH STAFF ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Pope Francis called for more respect for nature in an address at the University of Molise, an agricultural region in southern Italy.

Francis said the destruction of South America’s rain forests and other forms of environmental exploitation is a sin of modern times.

“This is one of the greatest challenges of our time: to convert ourselves to a type of development that knows how to respect creation,” he told students and farmers while speaking in a university hall on Saturday.

The Earth should be allowed to give her fruits without being exploited, Francis said.

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Saddam rumsfeldDonald Rumsfeld was Saddam's friend before he was his enemy. (Photo: Wikipedia)

The lies about weapons of mass destruction fell down upon the people of the United States like water rushing down Niagara Falls as Cheney, Bush and Rumsfeld used fear to jump start a war early last decade.

Republicans are, after all, good at sales and marketing. They are masters of getting voters to either buy or support products that they don't need - or using propaganda and mendacious campaigns to create a state of abject fear that succumbs to the government launching a military invasion allegedly to ensure national security.

In fact, in the summer of 2002, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card dismissed the notion that the administration would start pushing a war with Iraq at that time. To paraphrase Card's remark, "You don't start pushing a war until the fall, when people are back from vacation."

There is the indelible farcical, pathetic and vile image, of course, of George W. Bush pretending to "comically" search for weapons of mass destruction under the dais table at a White Horse Correspondents' Dinner. The stenographers of the DC press corps ignominiously roared with laughter.

The flags of a Three Percenter. (Photo: @mjb / Flickr)The flags of a Three Percenter. (Photo: @mjb / Flickr)BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

"You see an illegal. You point your gun dead at him, right between his eyes, and you say, 'Get back across the border or you will be shot.'" – Chris Davis, head of "Secure our Border – Laredo Sector."

Chris Davis, a man who over the past few years has been deeply involved with the armed-wing of the far right, is calling for militia members to grab their guns and head for the border. Although Davis is claiming that his new project is aimed at drug cartels and gangs, it is not especially far-fetched to consider that Davis might be looking for a Cliven Bundy moment; making a name for himself by leading a platoon of armed militia members to confront the women and children from Central America crossing the Texas-Mexico border.

Over the July 4th holiday weekend, Karen Antonacci reported in the Brownsville Herald that a group calling itself "'Patriots' has put out a call for people to go to the Texas-Mexico border and help with a citizen militia operation called 'Secure our Border - Laredo.'"

Davis' vigilante project comes despite assurances from Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Gil Kerlikowske, who recently told ABC News' Jim Avila that the Central Americans crossing the US border – now numbering 50,000 -- "are not dangerous individuals," nor a threat to national security.

It also comes against the backdrop of anti-immigrant activists in Murrieta, California, who received national attention after they forced US government buses full of the undocumented children to divert.

Page 3 of 1302