MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
As the political circus continues to unfold in the form of a three-ring television media primary, stitched together by tacky sports metaphors, maybe the best indicator of the sordid reality of this presidential race is that the two likely major party nominees are the most disliked candidates running. In fact, Trump and Clinton are viewed unfavorably at historically high levels.
Today -- after the New York primary -- there is breathless, sensationalistic coverage of the triumph of a blatantly racist and xenophobic candidate, who is likely to run against another candidate whose appeal appears to be, "Wouldn't you want me sitting in the Oval Office instead of that demagogue, even if I won't promise that I'll change much of anything because that's just reality?"
Yet, if you look past the top headlines, you realize just how much the presidential primary is taking place in an alternative universe, whose interests run directly counter to the needs of most people who live in this country. Discussions of public policy appear to be just window dressing on the 24-hour-a-day pugilistic accounts of candidate attacks on each other - or on the occasional gaffe that drops like a golden goose into the almighty cable television collection plate.
There are tens of millions of people in the US thirsting for transformation, but the results of the New York primary have put a damper on justice - social and economic - as not being "reasonable."
ECOWATCH FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUTLORRAINE CHOW OF
Article reprinted with permission from EcoWatch
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) said it will not regulate the potential cultivation and sale of a genetically modified (GMO)mushroom the same way it regulates conventional GMOs because the mushroom was made with the genome-editing tool CRISPR-Cas9.
This is the first time the U.S. government has cleared a food product edited with the new and controversial technique.
The USDA announced in a letter last week that it had approved Pennsylvania State University plant pathologist Yinong Yang's common white button mushroom (Agaricus bosporus) that's engineered to be more resistant to browning. As the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) wrote on April 13:
The anti-browning trait reduces the formation of brown pigment (melanin), improving the appearance and shelf life of mushroom, and facilitating automated mechanical harvesting.
Based on the information cited in your letter, APHIS has concluded that your CRISPR/Cas9-edited white button mushrooms as described in your letter do not contain any introduced genetic material. APHIS has no reason to believe that CRISPR/Cas9-edited white button mushrooms are plant pests.
According to Nature, the mushroom was created by targeting the family of genes that encodes the enzyme polyphenol oxidase that causes browning. "By deleting just a handful of base pairs in the mushroom's genome, Yang knocked out one of six PPO genes -- reducing the enzyme's activity by 30 percent," Nature reported.
JIM HIGHTOWER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
I've found it! I've discovered the original document from which today's tea party pontificators have drawn their political creed.
Tea-infused Republicans are the "anti" party -- anti-science, anti-public, anti-worker, anti-environment, anti-Obama ... anti-anti-anti. Where does all this unrelenting bombastic negativity come from? It turns out that their sour philosophy is rooted in "Horse Feathers." It's a 1932 Marx Brothers musical comedy that features Groucho belting out a song with these lyrics:
"Your proposition may be good/ But let's have one thing understood
Whatever it is, I'm against it!/ And even when you've changed it
Or condensed it/ I'm against it!"
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
An April 17 Spiegel Online article describes the growing vigilante movement in Eastern Europe to hunt down refugees from the Middle East, sometimes physically abusing and robbing them, and expelling them (as described in translation from the original German):
They patrol as self-appointed vigilantes in riot gear against refugee camps. They help the police and the army in border management....
From the Baltic to Bulgaria -- everywhere in Eastern Europe such right-wing private militias and vigilantes have [grown]. Many of them came years ago out of its niche existence as gun nuts and homeland security fanatics and marched, for example, as a protective force against alleged "Gypsy crime" on. Now they have discovered vigilante activity that they hope to receive increased social acceptance for: the so-called "migrant defense."
"Years of xenophobic propaganda from the very top"
The Czech political analyst and researcher of extremism Miroslav Mares of the Masaryk University in Brno calls [the militias tracking refugees from the Middle East] an "uncontrolled and dangerous phenomenon."
"The new vigilantes have left the area of the subculture," said Mares. "They are well organized, action-ready political forces."
Although Spiegel Online's coverage is focused on the Baltic nations, xenophobia -- not infrequently expressed through violence -- is on the rise across Europe. This includes the lethal impact of Europe's anti-refugee policies on the thousands of refugees who have died trying to circumvent Europe's strict immigration policies.
JOSH FOX OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
extreme weather, caused mammoth floods and unprecedented drought, it has gotten the ice caps to start a menacing thaw. The consequences of 1 degree have been far more severe than we ever imagined and we are on our way to 1.5 no matter what we do.The climate science is uncompromising. We’ve already warmed the earth 1 degree Celsius. And we have enough carbon and methane and other greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere and enough heat in the oceans to warm the earth another half a degree Celsius already. So if we stop all greenhouse gas emissions right now, we’ve already reached the 1.5 degree threshold. The current 1 degree rise has already increased
Now here’s the really tough part: At 2 degrees of warming, this gets much much worse. We are at an apocalyptic vision of the planet that few people want to imagine. We see worsening ocean acidification and other habitat loss that will kill off 30-50 percent of the species on the planet, we will see tropical diseases explode out of control and perhaps most damaging the slow thaw of the ice caps enters a critical and irreversible phase leading to between 5-9 meters of sea level rise.
At 7 meters of sea level rise, the greenhouse that just held the democratic debate in Brooklyn, where we saw the most robust discussion on climate change and fracking ever in presidential politics, will be under water. This kind of sea level rise will render New York City mostly uninhabitable. Sure, the Brooklyn Bridge won’t be underwater, but the on-ramp will be. Subways will be submerged, the Lower East Side, the Financial District, Red Hook, The Rockaways, the coast of Williamsburg, disappear under the east river and life in the Big Apple is nothing like what it was before.
PAUL BUCHHEIT FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
If, sad to ponder, the presidential election comes down to Hillary Clinton vs. a Republican, we'll be left either way with a business-friendly neocon White House. Given Hillary's past deceits and reversals, it's easy to see why she doesn't inspire trust among the American people.
"I won’t let anyone take us backward, deny our economy the benefits of harnessing a clean energy future, or force our children to endure the catastrophe that would result from unchecked climate change." --Hillary Clinton, 11/29/15
Greenpeace estimates that the Clinton campaign has taken $4.5 million from fossil fuel lobbyists and donors, and Naomi Klein and Grist have reported on all the money received from ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips and other oil sources. In response, Hillary explained, rather incoherently, "I have money from people who work for fossil fuel companies. I am so sick of the Sanders campaign lying about me."
"Is there really any argument that America must remain a preeminent leader for peace and freedom..?" --Hillary Clinton, 10/31/06
Dr. Jeffrey Sachs, an advisor to the United Nations, called Hillary "the candidate of the War Machine." In her book, "Hillary's Choice," author Gail Sheehy claimed it was Hillary who encouraged the president to bomb Kosovo. Then, as Secretary of State in 2011, she strongly supported war in Libya, a country which today is overwhelmed with crime and joblessness and a lack of basic necessities. She backed the escalation of the Afghanistan war, and in 2012, according to Sachs, she was largely responsible for the obstruction of peace efforts in Syria.
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Will former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, a confirmed serial child molester, be held to any serious legal accountability? That’s a question that Dennis Hastert himself would have quickly and undoubtedly answered in the affirmative more than a dozen years ago when he was a congressman from Illinois, and then Speaker of the US House of Representatives.
To look back on it now, it was a remarkable series of events:
In December 1998, after then Speaker Newt Gingrich resigned due to, among other things, a series of sexual peccadilloes, and after calling on President Bill Clinton to resign during the impeachment debate, Rep. Bob Livingston (R-La.) told a stunned House that he himself would not assume the speakership as planned, and would resign his seat in Congress. His resignation came after he was threatened with public disclosure of a series of his sexual peccadilloes. (Ironically, Livingston’s seat was taken by David Vitter, became the first popularly elected Republican U.S. senator from Louisiana and subsequently admitted to having been involved in a prostitution ring run, which only recently finally put the kibosh on his career.)
Next in line for the speakership was Dennis Hastert, the mild-mannered, occasionally gruff, but seemingly harmless congressman from Illinois. But Hastert had his own major secrets, and it took more than fifteen years for them to see the light of day.
Before revelations that Hastert had sexually abused students while he was a high school teacher and wrestling coach, Hastert was all about protecting the children.
ECOWATCH FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUTMARY ANNE HITT OF
Article reprinted with permission from EcoWatch
This week, a giant that had been teetering for many months finally fell, as Peabody Coal officially declared bankruptcy. For market watchers around the globe, this was a decisive movement in the long decline of an industry that once seemed invincible—the New York Times called it “Wall Street’s retreat from King Coal.” For those of us who live and work in Appalachia, this is the IMAX version of a movie we’ve seen many times before, one where coal company executives take the money and run, attempting to leave communities and taxpayers holding the bag for ruined communities, workers, mountains and rivers.
This time, we can’t let them get away with it. There’s way too much at stake.
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Once again, Erik Prince is back in the news. Jeremy Scahill, who has been investigating, writing about, and exposing Prince’s private security enterprises since Prince’s Blackwater USA days, has, along with co-author Matthew Cole, come up with an explosive and comprehensive piece of investigative reporting involving the headline-avoiding Prince. Scahill and Cole’s story, published at The Intercept and titled “Echo Papa Exposed: Inside Erik Prince’s Treacherous Drive to Build a Private Air Force,” provides the details behind Prince’s secret efforts to build his own private air force.
For several months, workers at a company called Airborne Technology, located about 30 miles south of Vienna, “had worked nearly nonstop to modify an American-made Thrush 510G crop duster to the exact specifications of an unnamed client. Everything about the project was cloaked in secrecy,” Scahill and Cole report. The client was only known as “Echo Papa,” and company officials “instructed employees to use code words to discuss certain modifications made to the plane.” Echo Papa was Erik Prince, who it turned out, “owned more than a quarter of their company. “
The plane was decked out with “surveillance and laser-targeting equipment,” as well as “bulletproof cockpit windows, an armored engine block, anti-explosive mesh for the fuel tank, and specialized wiring that could control rockets and bombs. The company also installed pods for mounting two high-powered 23 mm machine guns.”
JIM HIGHTOWER ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
In my travels and conversations this year, I've been encouraged that grassroots people of all progressive stripes (populist, labor, liberal, environmental, women, civil libertarian, et al.) are well aware of the slipperiness of "victory" and want Washington to get it right this time. So over and over, Question No. 1 that I encounter is some variation of this: What should we do!?! How do we make Washington govern for all the people? What specific things can my group or I do now?
Thanks for asking. The first thing you can do to bring about change is show up. Think of showing up as a sort of civic action, where you get to choose something that fits your temperament, personal level of activism, available time and energy, etc. The point here is that every one of us can do something — and every bit helps.
Simply being there matters. While progressives have shown up for elections in winning numbers, our movement then tends to fade politely into the shadows, leaving public officials (even those we put in office) free to ignore us and capitulate to ever-present, ever-insistent corporate interests. No more. Grassroots progressives — as individuals and through our groups — must get in the face of power and stay there.
This doesn't require a trip to Washington, though it can. It can be done right where you live — in personal meetings, on the phone, via email and letters, through social media (tweet at the twits!), on petitions, and any additional ways of communication that you and other creative people can invent. Hey, we're citizens, voters, constituents — so we should not hesitate to request in-person appointments to chat with officials back home (these need not be confrontational), attend forums where they'll be (local hearings, town hall sessions, speeches, meet & greets, parades, ribbon-cuttings, receptions, etc). They generally post their public schedules on their websites. Go to their meetings, ask questions, or at least say hello, introduce yourself, and try to achieve this: MAKE THEM LEARN YOUR NAME.