Doug Sosnik, a Democratic political strategist, wrote an interesting piece in Politico recently on how “the left” is taking over the Democratic Party. Of course, what he calls “left” would be centrist, maybe even right of center, in most other Western democracies, and I think it’s still true that today’s progressive icons – say, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren – are to the right of where old-line liberals like Teddy Kennedy were.
But Mr. Sosnik is right that there has been a pretty big change in the way Democrats approach things. Here’s how I’d put it: They have lost their post-Reagan cringe.
For a long time, it wasn’t just Republicans who believed that history was on their side; a lot of Democrats seemed to feel the same. There was an old cartoon from the 1980s showing Democrats laying out their new platform – tax cuts for the rich, benefit cuts for the poor and strong defense. When asked how this differed from the Republican platform, the answer was “Compassion: we care about the victims of our policies.”
But things have changed, for the reasons Mr. Sosnik described and more. Democrats have, after all, won the popular presidential vote in five of the past six elections.
Despite all the craziness and challenges, they have made big progress on their generations-long quest for universal health insurance.
They have a network of think tanks that is a lot less lavishly funded than the right-wing apparatus, but intellectually runs rings around its opponents.
And as Mr. Sosnik wrote more or less clearly, the craziness of the right in some ways empowers the moderate left.
Time was when “centrist” Democrats would in effect urge appeasement: don’t talk about inequality or say nasty things about privatization, or the right will get mad. But now it’s clear that no matter what you do, short of destroying the entire legacy of the New Deal, the mere fact of being a Democrat will bring accusations that you’re an atheist Islamic communist. So why not stand up for some liberal principles?
A Republican wave election later this year – not just a narrow win in the Senate with a very favorable map, but a drastic shift of the map – could bring back the cringe, I guess. But that’s looking less likely with each passing week, and in 2016 the map will favor Democrats.
How it all turns out is anyone’s guess – maybe we will eventually see a California scenario on a national basis, with the growing diversity of the electorate and the evident madness of the right delivering an overwhelming Democratic majority; maybe we will see some exogenous event tip the balance back to the G.O.P. despite what looks like a trend the other way. But what I don’t think we’ll see, even if there’s a Clinton in the White House, is another Clinton era in which liberals are afraid to take a stand.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.