Encouraging Signs for a Brighter 2014

Friday, 24 January 2014 11:17 By Paul Krugman, Krugman & Co. | Op-Ed
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print
  • Email

(Image: Van Dam / Landsmeer - Netherlands / CartoonArts International / The New York Times Syndicate)(Image: Van Dam / Landsmeer - Netherlands / CartoonArts International / The New York Times Syndicate)

There's an alarming amount of optimism out there about the United States' economic prospects for 2014. Let me make the situation even more alarming by saying that I basically share that optimism. Why? Because of the Three Stooges effect: if you've been banging your head against a wall for no good reason, you'll feel a lot better when you stop.

One way to describe the American economy in 2013 is to say that it was, in effect, trying to begin a strong recovery, but was held back by terrible federal fiscal policy. Housing was making a comeback; if state and local austerity policies were not going into reverse, at least they were not getting more intense; and household spending was starting to revive as debt levels came down.

But the feds were raising the payroll tax, slashing spending via the sequester, and more. Incidentally, because of these other factors, I don't take seriously the claims of market monetarists that the failure of growth to collapse in 2013 somehow shows that fiscal policy doesn't matter.

Austerity in the United States, although a really bad thing, wasn't nearly as intense as what happened in Southern Europe; it was restrained enough that it could be - and, I'd argue, was - more or less offset by other developments over the course of a single year.

The point, in any case, is that the head-banging is about to stop - not in a sense that we'll reverse our move in the wrong direction, but that we won't keep on moving in that direction. Meanwhile, the housing market is still improving, and other stuff is relatively favorable.

None of this vindicates the multiple years of sluggish recovery that should have been vigorous. And let's be clear: this kind of forecast is much less reliable than, say, my predictions that inflation and interest rates would stay low in the United States as long as we remained stuck in a liquidity trap, which were grounded in model fundamentals.

Still, the new year starts with some good omens. Oh, and on politics: since Obamacare is a nondisaster and Americans are facing the prospect of a decent rate of economic growth, the midterm congressional elections in November may not go the way that many conservatives currently expect.

What a Good Year Won't Prove

A brief addendum: If 2014 is a year of relatively good growth, you know that many people will take that as somehow refuting Keynesianism - "Hey, didn't you guys predict that the economy would never recover without fiscal stimulus?"

No, we didn't. As I wrote in 2009: "In the long run, we will have a spontaneous economic recovery, even if all current policy initiatives fail. On the other hand, in the long run ..." The fact that things eventually get better is neither a refutation of Keynesian analysis, nor a reason to excuse or overlook the vast economic and human costs of the bad policies to date - just as it does not vindicate austerity policies in Britain, either.

© 2014 The New York Times Company
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.
Paul Krugman joined The New York Times in 1999 as a columnist on the Op-Ed page and continues as a professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton University. He was awarded the Nobel in economic science in 2008. Mr Krugman is the author or editor of 20 books and more than 200 papers in professional journals and edited volumes, including "The Return of Depression Economics" (2008) and "The Conscience of a Liberal" (2007).
Copyright 2014 The New York Times.

Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus