Saturday, 01 November 2014 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG

In Afghanistan, Obama Says Wars of 9/11 Nearing an End

Wednesday, 02 May 2012 09:04 By Jonathan S Landay and Lesley Clark, McClatchy Newspapers | Report

President Barack Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai during the signing of a partnership agreement at the presidential palace in Kabul, Afghanistan, May 2, 2012.President Barack Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai during the signing of a partnership agreement at the presidential palace in Kabul, Afghanistan, May 2, 2012. (Photo: Doug Mills / The New York Times)Kabul, Afghanistan - President Barack Obama told Americans Tuesday that after a decade of post-September 11th wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, “we can see the light of a new day” – hours after signing an agreement that extended the U.S. commitment to Afghanistan.

Speaking early Wednesday morning local time from Bagram Air Base – a year after U.S. Navy SEALs killed al Qaida founder Osama bin Laden – Obama said the U.S. is prepared to shift into a limited support role in the region after combat troops leave in 2014 and begin to “emerge from a decade of conflict abroad and economic crisis at home.”

“This time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end,” Obama said an election-year speech that invoked the September 11th attacks on the U.S. and cast him as ending the wars.

However, just hours after Obama departed, as many as six suicide bombers early Wednesday attacked a sprawling, heavily guarded compound on the eastern edge of downtown Kabul where international contractors are housed, police and witnesses said.

One attacker detonated his explosives outside the entrance to the Green Village on the Jalalabad Road, while others appeared to have penetrated the walled facility, sparking a ferocious gun battle, they said. Independent Tolo TV broadcast video of the scene showing the bodies of dead and wounded laying on the highway amid the smoldering wreckage of vehicles. A witness, who asked not to be identified, said by telephone that he'd counted at least six dead.

The attack underscored afresh the vulnerability of the supposedly tightly secure Afghan capital to insurgent attacks aimed at embarrassing the government and its Western backers and sowing uncertainty among ordinary Afghans about the country's stability as U.S.-led combat forces withdraw. It served as a sharp counterpoint to Obama's comments that “over the last three years, the tide has turned” in the battle against the Taliban and their allies.

“We broke the Taliban’s momentum," Obama said. "We’ve built strong Afghan security forces. We devastated al Qaeda’s leadership, taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders. And one year ago, from a base here in Afghanistan, our troops launched the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. The goal that I set – to defeat al Qaeda, and deny it a chance to rebuild – is within reach.”

Obama said the administration has been in direct talks with Taliban members and that they "can be a part of this future if they break with al Qaeda, renounce violence, and abide by Afghan laws."

He said many members "from foot soldiers to leaders" have indicated an interest in reconciliation and that "a path to peace is now set before them.”

"Those who refuse to walk it will face strong Afghan security forces, backed by the United States and our allies," he said.

The president left Afghanistan soon after delivering his speech. The strike early Wednesday came just over two weeks after squads of suicide attackers staged coordinated attacks against government and foreign facilities, including the U.S. Embassy and NATO headquarters, in Kabul and in three provincial capitals.

The United States blamed those attacks on the Haqqani network, a Taliban ally that is based in the neighboring tribal area of Pakistan, operates in eastern Afghanistan and has become notorious for staging the most spectacular and bloody strikes in the Afghan capital.

Obama's remarks Tuesday came just hours after he and Afghan President Hamid Karzai put their signatures to a far-reaching pact that will govern U.S. support for Afghanistan after U.S. combat forces are gone at the end of 2014.

Obama, who made the trip to Afghanistan unannounced ,and Karzai signed the agreement in front of Afghan and U.S. flags at the presidential palace, just after midnight local time.Obama called the signing of the pact a “historic moment for our two nations.”

There were “warm handshakes all around” and Karzai appeared to be in an ebullient mood, offering profuse thanks to negotiators on the agreement, including U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker.

After the signing, Obama addressed U.S. troops at Bagram, crediting them with blunting the Taliban, driving al Qaida out of Afghanistan and decimating its ranks.

But he warned that the conflict wasn’t yet over.

“There’s going to be heartbreak and pain and difficulty ahead,” he told the 3,200 service members gathered at a hangar at the base. “But there’s a light on the horizon because of the sacrifices you’ve made.”

And in a remark that drew loud applause, he noted that it was a year ago “that we were able to finally bring Osama bin Laden to justice.”

“That could have only happened because each and every one of you, in your own way, were doing your jobs,” he said. “Each and every one of you _ without a lot of fanfare, without a lot of fuss _ you did your jobs.”

A report released Tuesday by the Pentagon detailed the gains in Afghanistan. It noted that thus far this year, enemy attacks are down 16 percent, and the report says recent allied efforts ”seriously degraded the insurgency’s ability to mount a major offensive” this year.

Other parts of the report, though, were less certain about progress. It noted continuing “long-term and acute challenges,” the “Taliban-led insurgency and its al Qaida affiliates still operate with impunity from sanctuaries in Pakistan,” and “the Afghan government continues to face widespread corruption that limits its effectiveness and legitimacy and bolsters insurgent messaging.”

The pact signing and Obama’s address to the troops came one year almost to the hour that U.S. special forces, flying from Afghanistan, burst into the Pakistan hideout of bin Laden and shot him dead. Senior White House officials acknowledged that the trip fell on the anniversary, but they said the timing was driven by the desire of both presidents to have the strategic partnership agreement signed, in Afghanistan, before a NATO summit scheduled for Chicago later this month. White House officials said the local signing underscores the U.S. commitment to Afghan sovereignty.

The trip comes as Republicans have criticized Obama for using the bin Laden raid in a campaign ad that also questioned whether Mitt Romney would have made the same call. Though the president is generally off limits while traveling overseas, Oklahoma Republican Sen. Jim Inhofe accused him of politicizing the war in Afghanistan.

“Clearly this trip is campaign related,” Inhofe said in a statement released just after Obama signed the agreement. “We’ve seen recently that President Obama has visited college campuses in an attempt to win back the support of that age group since he has lost it over the last three years. Similarly, this trip to Afghanistan is an attempt to shore up his national security credentials.”

White House officials said Obama had long planned to spend the anniversary with U.S. troops and his trip also seemed intended as personal assurance to Karzai that the United States won’t abandon Afghanistan after most U.S. forces are gone. By flying to Kabul for the signing, Obama also would be seen as paying respect to Karzai, whom the Taliban has denounced as “a puppet” of the United States.

It also may well have been intended to reassure ordinary Afghans as well. Many are deeply worried that the departure of U.S. combat forces will energize the Taliban-led insurgency, igniting a new spiral of mayhem and bloodshed.

Obama’s trip, his third to Afghanistan, began in enormous secrecy to ensure strict security just two weeks after insurgent attacks penetrated the security rings of Kabul and three provincial capitals. But word that Obama was coming leaked to Afghan news media Tuesday evening, hours before he arrived, igniting furious denials by the U.S. Embassy, the White House and the presidential palace.

Obama landed 10:20 p.m. at Bagram, the largest U.S. military base in the country, just north of Kabul. He then helicoptered into the city to the fortress-like presidential palace, where he joined Karzai for the low-key signing ceremony. The growl of prowling helicopter gunships echoed across Kabul’s nighttime sky.

The text of the new agreement had been kept secret since it was initialed on April 22 by Ambassador Crocker and Karzai’s national security adviser, Rangin Spanta.

The nine-page pact comprises a preamble and seven provisions covering all facets of the future relationship, from a U.S. vow to help defend Afghanistan against al Qaida and other threats, to Kabul’s commitment to “inclusive and pluralistic democratic governance, including free, fair and transparent elections.”

White House officials said the only post-2014 U.S. presence would be for training and counterterrorism and that there would be no U.S. bases. The pact binds the sides to close defense cooperation to bolster Afghanistan’s security, “combat al Qaida and its affiliates,” and enhance Afghanistan’s ability to defend itself. Afghanistan would be designated a “major non-NATO ally,” which brings U.S. defense and financial help not normally available to countries that don’t belong to the alliance.

The sides are to negotiate a separate bilateral security agreement governing the number of U.S. troops and Pentagon civilians to remain in Afghanistan after 2014 to train Afghan forces and to provide them with intelligence and logistics support. The sides would try to finalize that accord within a year.

The United States and its NATO allies are in the midst of transferring security responsibilities to Afghan forces, a phased process that is to end with the departure of all U.S. and allied combat troops by December 2014. Some 10,000 U.S. troops left last year, and another 20,000 are to go this year.

U.S. and NATO officials say that Afghan security forces are increasingly taking the lead in operations against the Taliban-led insurgency, and they express confidence that with continued support, the Afghans will be able to hold their own.

Some Afghan officers and soldiers, however, are very worried that the army, which is plagued by nepotism, corruption and ethnic tensions, won’t withstand the stain, especially if Pakistan continues providing sanctuary and other support to the Taliban and allied extremists.

Clark reported from Washington, Landay from Kabul. McClatchy special correspondent Ali Safi contributed from Kabul.

© 2012 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.

Lesley Clark

Lesley Clark works for The Miami Herald and The Bradenton (Florida) Herald. She's worked for The Miami Herald in Washington since February 2011, and before that in Miami and Tallahassee, covering state government and politics. She's a graduate of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Jonathan S Landay

Jonathan S. Landay, national security and intelligence correspondent, has written about foreign affairs and US defense, intelligence and foreign policies for 15 years. From 1985-94, he covered South Asia and the Balkans for United Press International and then the Christian Science Monitor. He moved to Washington in December 1994 to cover defense and foreign affairs for the Christian Science Monitor and joined Knight Ridder in October 1999. He speaks frequently on national security matters, particularly the Balkans. In 2005, he was part of a team that won a National Headliners Award for "How the Bush Administration Went to War in Iraq.'' He also won a 2005 Award of Distinction from the Medill School of Journalism for "Iraqi exiles fed exaggerated tips to news media."


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb


In Afghanistan, Obama Says Wars of 9/11 Nearing an End

Wednesday, 02 May 2012 09:04 By Jonathan S Landay and Lesley Clark, McClatchy Newspapers | Report

President Barack Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai during the signing of a partnership agreement at the presidential palace in Kabul, Afghanistan, May 2, 2012.President Barack Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai during the signing of a partnership agreement at the presidential palace in Kabul, Afghanistan, May 2, 2012. (Photo: Doug Mills / The New York Times)Kabul, Afghanistan - President Barack Obama told Americans Tuesday that after a decade of post-September 11th wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, “we can see the light of a new day” – hours after signing an agreement that extended the U.S. commitment to Afghanistan.

Speaking early Wednesday morning local time from Bagram Air Base – a year after U.S. Navy SEALs killed al Qaida founder Osama bin Laden – Obama said the U.S. is prepared to shift into a limited support role in the region after combat troops leave in 2014 and begin to “emerge from a decade of conflict abroad and economic crisis at home.”

“This time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end,” Obama said an election-year speech that invoked the September 11th attacks on the U.S. and cast him as ending the wars.

However, just hours after Obama departed, as many as six suicide bombers early Wednesday attacked a sprawling, heavily guarded compound on the eastern edge of downtown Kabul where international contractors are housed, police and witnesses said.

One attacker detonated his explosives outside the entrance to the Green Village on the Jalalabad Road, while others appeared to have penetrated the walled facility, sparking a ferocious gun battle, they said. Independent Tolo TV broadcast video of the scene showing the bodies of dead and wounded laying on the highway amid the smoldering wreckage of vehicles. A witness, who asked not to be identified, said by telephone that he'd counted at least six dead.

The attack underscored afresh the vulnerability of the supposedly tightly secure Afghan capital to insurgent attacks aimed at embarrassing the government and its Western backers and sowing uncertainty among ordinary Afghans about the country's stability as U.S.-led combat forces withdraw. It served as a sharp counterpoint to Obama's comments that “over the last three years, the tide has turned” in the battle against the Taliban and their allies.

“We broke the Taliban’s momentum," Obama said. "We’ve built strong Afghan security forces. We devastated al Qaeda’s leadership, taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders. And one year ago, from a base here in Afghanistan, our troops launched the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. The goal that I set – to defeat al Qaeda, and deny it a chance to rebuild – is within reach.”

Obama said the administration has been in direct talks with Taliban members and that they "can be a part of this future if they break with al Qaeda, renounce violence, and abide by Afghan laws."

He said many members "from foot soldiers to leaders" have indicated an interest in reconciliation and that "a path to peace is now set before them.”

"Those who refuse to walk it will face strong Afghan security forces, backed by the United States and our allies," he said.

The president left Afghanistan soon after delivering his speech. The strike early Wednesday came just over two weeks after squads of suicide attackers staged coordinated attacks against government and foreign facilities, including the U.S. Embassy and NATO headquarters, in Kabul and in three provincial capitals.

The United States blamed those attacks on the Haqqani network, a Taliban ally that is based in the neighboring tribal area of Pakistan, operates in eastern Afghanistan and has become notorious for staging the most spectacular and bloody strikes in the Afghan capital.

Obama's remarks Tuesday came just hours after he and Afghan President Hamid Karzai put their signatures to a far-reaching pact that will govern U.S. support for Afghanistan after U.S. combat forces are gone at the end of 2014.

Obama, who made the trip to Afghanistan unannounced ,and Karzai signed the agreement in front of Afghan and U.S. flags at the presidential palace, just after midnight local time.Obama called the signing of the pact a “historic moment for our two nations.”

There were “warm handshakes all around” and Karzai appeared to be in an ebullient mood, offering profuse thanks to negotiators on the agreement, including U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker.

After the signing, Obama addressed U.S. troops at Bagram, crediting them with blunting the Taliban, driving al Qaida out of Afghanistan and decimating its ranks.

But he warned that the conflict wasn’t yet over.

“There’s going to be heartbreak and pain and difficulty ahead,” he told the 3,200 service members gathered at a hangar at the base. “But there’s a light on the horizon because of the sacrifices you’ve made.”

And in a remark that drew loud applause, he noted that it was a year ago “that we were able to finally bring Osama bin Laden to justice.”

“That could have only happened because each and every one of you, in your own way, were doing your jobs,” he said. “Each and every one of you _ without a lot of fanfare, without a lot of fuss _ you did your jobs.”

A report released Tuesday by the Pentagon detailed the gains in Afghanistan. It noted that thus far this year, enemy attacks are down 16 percent, and the report says recent allied efforts ”seriously degraded the insurgency’s ability to mount a major offensive” this year.

Other parts of the report, though, were less certain about progress. It noted continuing “long-term and acute challenges,” the “Taliban-led insurgency and its al Qaida affiliates still operate with impunity from sanctuaries in Pakistan,” and “the Afghan government continues to face widespread corruption that limits its effectiveness and legitimacy and bolsters insurgent messaging.”

The pact signing and Obama’s address to the troops came one year almost to the hour that U.S. special forces, flying from Afghanistan, burst into the Pakistan hideout of bin Laden and shot him dead. Senior White House officials acknowledged that the trip fell on the anniversary, but they said the timing was driven by the desire of both presidents to have the strategic partnership agreement signed, in Afghanistan, before a NATO summit scheduled for Chicago later this month. White House officials said the local signing underscores the U.S. commitment to Afghan sovereignty.

The trip comes as Republicans have criticized Obama for using the bin Laden raid in a campaign ad that also questioned whether Mitt Romney would have made the same call. Though the president is generally off limits while traveling overseas, Oklahoma Republican Sen. Jim Inhofe accused him of politicizing the war in Afghanistan.

“Clearly this trip is campaign related,” Inhofe said in a statement released just after Obama signed the agreement. “We’ve seen recently that President Obama has visited college campuses in an attempt to win back the support of that age group since he has lost it over the last three years. Similarly, this trip to Afghanistan is an attempt to shore up his national security credentials.”

White House officials said Obama had long planned to spend the anniversary with U.S. troops and his trip also seemed intended as personal assurance to Karzai that the United States won’t abandon Afghanistan after most U.S. forces are gone. By flying to Kabul for the signing, Obama also would be seen as paying respect to Karzai, whom the Taliban has denounced as “a puppet” of the United States.

It also may well have been intended to reassure ordinary Afghans as well. Many are deeply worried that the departure of U.S. combat forces will energize the Taliban-led insurgency, igniting a new spiral of mayhem and bloodshed.

Obama’s trip, his third to Afghanistan, began in enormous secrecy to ensure strict security just two weeks after insurgent attacks penetrated the security rings of Kabul and three provincial capitals. But word that Obama was coming leaked to Afghan news media Tuesday evening, hours before he arrived, igniting furious denials by the U.S. Embassy, the White House and the presidential palace.

Obama landed 10:20 p.m. at Bagram, the largest U.S. military base in the country, just north of Kabul. He then helicoptered into the city to the fortress-like presidential palace, where he joined Karzai for the low-key signing ceremony. The growl of prowling helicopter gunships echoed across Kabul’s nighttime sky.

The text of the new agreement had been kept secret since it was initialed on April 22 by Ambassador Crocker and Karzai’s national security adviser, Rangin Spanta.

The nine-page pact comprises a preamble and seven provisions covering all facets of the future relationship, from a U.S. vow to help defend Afghanistan against al Qaida and other threats, to Kabul’s commitment to “inclusive and pluralistic democratic governance, including free, fair and transparent elections.”

White House officials said the only post-2014 U.S. presence would be for training and counterterrorism and that there would be no U.S. bases. The pact binds the sides to close defense cooperation to bolster Afghanistan’s security, “combat al Qaida and its affiliates,” and enhance Afghanistan’s ability to defend itself. Afghanistan would be designated a “major non-NATO ally,” which brings U.S. defense and financial help not normally available to countries that don’t belong to the alliance.

The sides are to negotiate a separate bilateral security agreement governing the number of U.S. troops and Pentagon civilians to remain in Afghanistan after 2014 to train Afghan forces and to provide them with intelligence and logistics support. The sides would try to finalize that accord within a year.

The United States and its NATO allies are in the midst of transferring security responsibilities to Afghan forces, a phased process that is to end with the departure of all U.S. and allied combat troops by December 2014. Some 10,000 U.S. troops left last year, and another 20,000 are to go this year.

U.S. and NATO officials say that Afghan security forces are increasingly taking the lead in operations against the Taliban-led insurgency, and they express confidence that with continued support, the Afghans will be able to hold their own.

Some Afghan officers and soldiers, however, are very worried that the army, which is plagued by nepotism, corruption and ethnic tensions, won’t withstand the stain, especially if Pakistan continues providing sanctuary and other support to the Taliban and allied extremists.

Clark reported from Washington, Landay from Kabul. McClatchy special correspondent Ali Safi contributed from Kabul.

© 2012 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.

Lesley Clark

Lesley Clark works for The Miami Herald and The Bradenton (Florida) Herald. She's worked for The Miami Herald in Washington since February 2011, and before that in Miami and Tallahassee, covering state government and politics. She's a graduate of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Jonathan S Landay

Jonathan S. Landay, national security and intelligence correspondent, has written about foreign affairs and US defense, intelligence and foreign policies for 15 years. From 1985-94, he covered South Asia and the Balkans for United Press International and then the Christian Science Monitor. He moved to Washington in December 1994 to cover defense and foreign affairs for the Christian Science Monitor and joined Knight Ridder in October 1999. He speaks frequently on national security matters, particularly the Balkans. In 2005, he was part of a team that won a National Headliners Award for "How the Bush Administration Went to War in Iraq.'' He also won a 2005 Award of Distinction from the Medill School of Journalism for "Iraqi exiles fed exaggerated tips to news media."


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus