Monday, 22 September 2014 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG

25 Years Later, McCleskey Decision Still Fosters Racism by Ignoring It

Sunday, 22 April 2012 15:15 By Eva Paterson and Christina Swarns, American Constitution Society Blog | News Analysis

Few cases involving the intersection of race, criminal law, and procedure have had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp, a United States Supreme Court decision decided 25 years ago, on April 22, 1987. This decision set the stage for more than 20 years of dramatically increasing racial disparities within the criminal justice system.

In McCleskey, the Supreme Court declared that a criminal justice system that treats Blacks worse than whites is "inevitable" and that the Constitution is only violated by instances of intentional racial discrimination by individual actors in specific cases.

Specifically, the Court refused to set aside the death sentence of Warren McCleskey, an African American man who was sentenced to death in Georgia for the killing of a white person, despite the fact that statistical evidence demonstrated that in Georgia capital cases, African Americans were more likely to receive a death sentence than any other defendants, and that African American defendants who killed white victims were the most likely to be sentenced to death.

The implications of the McCleskey decision are profound. Because of McCleskey, there is no remedy for – and, indeed, no constitutional problem with – the fact that Blacks are disproportionately stopped, searched, arrested, held on bail, charged with serious crimes (including death-eligible offenses), denied plea bargains, convicted, and sentenced to prison or execution.

There is no constitutional basis for challenging the fact that one in three African American males will enter state or federal prison at some point in his lifetime; and that although African Americans make up only 12 percent of the U.S. population, they amount to 44 percent of sentenced inmates – the largest group behind bars.

Furthermore, because of McCleskey, there is no way to stop the criminal justice system from producing significant racial disparities in access to meaningful employment, to public housing, to higher education, and to voting. Because McCleskey's devastating reach extends far beyond the four corners of the courthouse or the jail cell, it has relegated people of color to second-class citizen status simply because of their race or ethnicity.

It is nothing short of "the Dred Scott decision of our time."

To observe this tragic anniversary, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) and the Equal Justice Society (EJS) have joined with organizations across the country, including the ACLU Capital Punishment Project, the Capital Litigation Communications Project, the Center for Death Penalty Litigation Inc., the Death Penalty Information Center, Equal Justice USA, the Innocence Project, the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and the Proteus Fund, to raise awareness of how this landmark decision fundamentally threatens equality and opportunity in this country.

Together, we launched mccleskyvkemp.com, a website that provides information about the ongoing crisis of race in criminal justice and offers information about specific activities that individuals and organizations can take to repeal the death penalty and ameliorate the racial disparities in the criminal justice system.

The site includes publications and reports, media articles, links to take action, as well as information about the LDF/Columbia Law School Symposium, "Pursuing Racial Fairness in Criminal Justice: Twenty Years After McCleskey v. Kemp," which was held in March of 2007 to mark the 20th anniversary of the McCleskey decision. The site is also cross-posting the ACLU's daily blog special series on McCleskey and also engaging the #McCleskey conversation on Twitter.

Warren McCleskey was an African American man who was sentenced to death in 1978 for killing a white police officer during the robbery of a Georgia furniture store. Mr. McCleskey appealed his conviction and sentence, relying on the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment and the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of Equal Protection to argue that the death penalty in Georgia was administered in a racially discriminatory – and therefore unconstitutional – manner.

Jack Boger, then director of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund Inc.'s Capital Punishment Project, litigated the case from the federal district court through the United States Supreme Court. Relying on the most comprehensive statistical analysis of the role of race in the administration of capital punishment that had ever been conducted, LDF presented the courts with strong evidence demonstrating that race played a pivotal role in the Georgia capital punishment system.

Although the evidence presented by LDF gave the Court the opportunity to acknowledge and renounce the arbitrary influence of race on the administration of the death penalty, the Court found no constitutional error in a system where African Americans faced worse criminal justice outcomes – indeed execution – because of their race.

In a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr., the Court ruled against Mr. McCleskey and found that unless he could submit evidence showing that a specific person in his case acted with a racially discriminatory purpose, Mr. McCleskey's death sentence – and the stark racial disparities in Georgia's capital punishment system – would stand.

Justice Powell later admitted to his biographer that he was wrong in the McCleskey case and that he would change his vote if given the chance.

Visit mccleskyvkemp.com and learn how you can join us in the effort to raise awareness of this landmark decision that every day threatens the ideals of equality and opportunity in this country.

 

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Christina Swarns

Christina Swarns is LDF Director of the Criminal Justice Practice. 

Eva Paterson

Eva Paterson is Equal Justice Society President and Co-Founder. Paterson is also a member of the Bay Area Lawyer Chapter Board of Advisors.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb


Error
  • JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 51

25 Years Later, McCleskey Decision Still Fosters Racism by Ignoring It

Sunday, 22 April 2012 15:15 By Eva Paterson and Christina Swarns, American Constitution Society Blog | News Analysis

Few cases involving the intersection of race, criminal law, and procedure have had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp, a United States Supreme Court decision decided 25 years ago, on April 22, 1987. This decision set the stage for more than 20 years of dramatically increasing racial disparities within the criminal justice system.

In McCleskey, the Supreme Court declared that a criminal justice system that treats Blacks worse than whites is "inevitable" and that the Constitution is only violated by instances of intentional racial discrimination by individual actors in specific cases.

Specifically, the Court refused to set aside the death sentence of Warren McCleskey, an African American man who was sentenced to death in Georgia for the killing of a white person, despite the fact that statistical evidence demonstrated that in Georgia capital cases, African Americans were more likely to receive a death sentence than any other defendants, and that African American defendants who killed white victims were the most likely to be sentenced to death.

The implications of the McCleskey decision are profound. Because of McCleskey, there is no remedy for – and, indeed, no constitutional problem with – the fact that Blacks are disproportionately stopped, searched, arrested, held on bail, charged with serious crimes (including death-eligible offenses), denied plea bargains, convicted, and sentenced to prison or execution.

There is no constitutional basis for challenging the fact that one in three African American males will enter state or federal prison at some point in his lifetime; and that although African Americans make up only 12 percent of the U.S. population, they amount to 44 percent of sentenced inmates – the largest group behind bars.

Furthermore, because of McCleskey, there is no way to stop the criminal justice system from producing significant racial disparities in access to meaningful employment, to public housing, to higher education, and to voting. Because McCleskey's devastating reach extends far beyond the four corners of the courthouse or the jail cell, it has relegated people of color to second-class citizen status simply because of their race or ethnicity.

It is nothing short of "the Dred Scott decision of our time."

To observe this tragic anniversary, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) and the Equal Justice Society (EJS) have joined with organizations across the country, including the ACLU Capital Punishment Project, the Capital Litigation Communications Project, the Center for Death Penalty Litigation Inc., the Death Penalty Information Center, Equal Justice USA, the Innocence Project, the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and the Proteus Fund, to raise awareness of how this landmark decision fundamentally threatens equality and opportunity in this country.

Together, we launched mccleskyvkemp.com, a website that provides information about the ongoing crisis of race in criminal justice and offers information about specific activities that individuals and organizations can take to repeal the death penalty and ameliorate the racial disparities in the criminal justice system.

The site includes publications and reports, media articles, links to take action, as well as information about the LDF/Columbia Law School Symposium, "Pursuing Racial Fairness in Criminal Justice: Twenty Years After McCleskey v. Kemp," which was held in March of 2007 to mark the 20th anniversary of the McCleskey decision. The site is also cross-posting the ACLU's daily blog special series on McCleskey and also engaging the #McCleskey conversation on Twitter.

Warren McCleskey was an African American man who was sentenced to death in 1978 for killing a white police officer during the robbery of a Georgia furniture store. Mr. McCleskey appealed his conviction and sentence, relying on the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment and the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of Equal Protection to argue that the death penalty in Georgia was administered in a racially discriminatory – and therefore unconstitutional – manner.

Jack Boger, then director of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund Inc.'s Capital Punishment Project, litigated the case from the federal district court through the United States Supreme Court. Relying on the most comprehensive statistical analysis of the role of race in the administration of capital punishment that had ever been conducted, LDF presented the courts with strong evidence demonstrating that race played a pivotal role in the Georgia capital punishment system.

Although the evidence presented by LDF gave the Court the opportunity to acknowledge and renounce the arbitrary influence of race on the administration of the death penalty, the Court found no constitutional error in a system where African Americans faced worse criminal justice outcomes – indeed execution – because of their race.

In a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr., the Court ruled against Mr. McCleskey and found that unless he could submit evidence showing that a specific person in his case acted with a racially discriminatory purpose, Mr. McCleskey's death sentence – and the stark racial disparities in Georgia's capital punishment system – would stand.

Justice Powell later admitted to his biographer that he was wrong in the McCleskey case and that he would change his vote if given the chance.

Visit mccleskyvkemp.com and learn how you can join us in the effort to raise awareness of this landmark decision that every day threatens the ideals of equality and opportunity in this country.

 

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Christina Swarns

Christina Swarns is LDF Director of the Criminal Justice Practice. 

Eva Paterson

Eva Paterson is Equal Justice Society President and Co-Founder. Paterson is also a member of the Bay Area Lawyer Chapter Board of Advisors.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus