We speak with Rewire legal analyst Jessica Mason Pieklo about how Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch emerged as one of the court’s most conservative justices as his first term came to an end in June.
TRANSCRIPT
AMY GOODMAN: Jessica, you’ve also been writing about the new Supreme Court justice, Neil Gorsuch. Can you talk about how he has affected the court so far, what you’re seeing, and how this will play out for women?
JESSICA MASON PIEKLO: Absolutely. Neil Gorsuch has made his mark on the Supreme Court immediately, and it will be a mark that lasts decades.
During his confirmation process, we heard a lot about what a nice guy Justice Gorsuch is, about how he’s very competent and he’s an excellent legal scholar. All of those things are very true. And we would hope that all of those things would be the base minimum qualifications for anybody on the Supreme Court.
What we failed, in detail, to discuss, largely in the media — I think we did a good job here at Rewire, but what we largely failed to discuss was the substance of his writings and his career. And when we look through the substance not just of his writings, but his career, we see some very conservative things. First and foremost, we see that he worked on torture-in-detention policy during his time at the Department of Justice, which will become increasingly regular as the court hears challenges on things like the Trump administration’s travel ban, the Muslim ban.
We’ve also seen him write extremely conservative concurrences, when he was on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, in the Hobby Lobby case, that would have effectively given organizations a blank check to make religious moral objections, not just to the contraception benefit, to laws that are readily applicable. We will see that impact in this coming term in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, a case out of Colorado where a baker refused to bake a cake for a same-sex couple on the grounds that he had a moral and religious objection to same-sex marriage. And it wasn’t just that he turned them away. It’s that he explicitly said he wouldn’t bake a cake because they were a gay couple. The Supreme Court has taken that case up, and we will see it.
And, of course, there are the pending rumors of a retirement for Justice Anthony Kennedy. Justice Gorsuch was Anthony Kennedy’s clerk, and there was a lot of speculation that one of the reasons he was the nominee was to help smooth the relationship over with Justice Kennedy. After all, they go way back. They’re friendly. They’re collegial. Should Justice Kennedy retire, and when he does — I mean, he will at some point, whether this term or the next or the following — presuming we still are in a Trump presidency and get a Trump nominee, we can be guaranteed that that justice will be as conservative, if not more so, than Justice Alito. What we’ve seen so far is Justice Gorsuch has voted consistently with Justice Thomas and has placed him on the court’s most conservative side. He’s also very active in oral arguments and combative with both attorneys and his fellow justices. So he will be a big intellectual presence in arguments. When Kennedy retires, that will make Chief Justice John Roberts the swing vote on the court.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.