Friday, 19 December 2014 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG
  • Homeless People: Do You Just "Walk On By"?

    Is there a helpful way to respond when you encounter one of the approximately 578,424 people who are homeless on any given night in the United States today?

  • Quiet Distress Among the (Ex) Rich

    Yves Smith: The fact that economic distress has moved pretty high up the food chain is a sign that this recovery isn't all that it is cracked up to be.

Justice Department Condemns Texas Redistricting

Wednesday, 21 September 2011 04:31 By Molly HennessyFiske, McClatchy Newspapers | Report

Texas' Republican-controlled Legislature violated the federal Voting Rights Act by adopting new congressional and legislative district maps that disenfranchise minority voters, the Justice Department has told a Washington federal court in a new filing this week.

In the filing, Justice Department officials noted that their differences with Texas "can be substantially narrowed" and that they would provide the state with proposals Tuesday to limit the number of districts it would contest.

More details may emerge at a pretrial hearing Wednesday.

The state picked up four seats in Congress due to growth documented in the last census, growth driven by minority communities, experts say.

But the redistricting plan Gov. Rick Perry signed in June created no additional Latino or "opportunity" districts, critics say. They separately challenged the new maps in federal district court in San Antonio. Arguments in the case ended last week and a decision is pending, likely after the Washington court rules, legal observers say.

Texas officials have defended their maps, saying in a court filing that the maps seek "to equalize population as required by the 'one-person, one-vote' principle, avoid pairing incumbents, preserve city lines and preserve the cores of prior districts when possible."

Under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, Texas and 15 other states with a history of disenfranchising minority voters must seek federal approval before changing election procedures. Officials in the mostly Southern states usually seek preclearance from the Justice Department to ensure they comply.

This July, Texas officials opted instead to ask a special three-judge federal court in Washington to approve the new maps.

In a nine-page response to those maps filed Monday, the Justice Department said neither Texas' congressional nor state House plans complied with provisions of the Voting Rights Act. The department didn't raise objections to maps Texas proposed for its state Senate and Board of Education.

In 2006, the Supreme Court found that the redistricting plan Texas approved after the 2000 Census violated the Voting Rights Act, and state officials had to redraw the maps to create another Latino district.

© 2011 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb


Error
  • JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 12015

Justice Department Condemns Texas Redistricting

Wednesday, 21 September 2011 04:31 By Molly HennessyFiske, McClatchy Newspapers | Report

Texas' Republican-controlled Legislature violated the federal Voting Rights Act by adopting new congressional and legislative district maps that disenfranchise minority voters, the Justice Department has told a Washington federal court in a new filing this week.

In the filing, Justice Department officials noted that their differences with Texas "can be substantially narrowed" and that they would provide the state with proposals Tuesday to limit the number of districts it would contest.

More details may emerge at a pretrial hearing Wednesday.

The state picked up four seats in Congress due to growth documented in the last census, growth driven by minority communities, experts say.

But the redistricting plan Gov. Rick Perry signed in June created no additional Latino or "opportunity" districts, critics say. They separately challenged the new maps in federal district court in San Antonio. Arguments in the case ended last week and a decision is pending, likely after the Washington court rules, legal observers say.

Texas officials have defended their maps, saying in a court filing that the maps seek "to equalize population as required by the 'one-person, one-vote' principle, avoid pairing incumbents, preserve city lines and preserve the cores of prior districts when possible."

Under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, Texas and 15 other states with a history of disenfranchising minority voters must seek federal approval before changing election procedures. Officials in the mostly Southern states usually seek preclearance from the Justice Department to ensure they comply.

This July, Texas officials opted instead to ask a special three-judge federal court in Washington to approve the new maps.

In a nine-page response to those maps filed Monday, the Justice Department said neither Texas' congressional nor state House plans complied with provisions of the Voting Rights Act. The department didn't raise objections to maps Texas proposed for its state Senate and Board of Education.

In 2006, the Supreme Court found that the redistricting plan Texas approved after the 2000 Census violated the Voting Rights Act, and state officials had to redraw the maps to create another Latino district.

© 2011 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus