BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
To be perfectly honest, most of us would be hard-pressed to have a handle on the range of the myriad of functions of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. We would likely get the part about meat and poultry inspections, and maybe the fact that the agency oversees the food stamp program, but otherwise we would be pretty unclear about the scope of the agency's work. As Michael Lewis reports in the December issue of Vanity Fair, most of what the USDA does "has little to do with agriculture," as it spends only a "small fraction" of its $164 billion budget (2016) on farmers.
Among other things, the USDA "runs 193 million acres of natural forest and grasslands [and] It is charged with inspecting almost all the animals people eat." The agency runs a "massive science program; a bank with $220 billion in assets; plus a large fleet of aircraft for firefighting," There's more; it finances and manages numerous programs in rural America, "including the free school lunch for kids living near the poverty line."
A Vanity Fair USDA Organizational Chart has the Secretary and Deputy Secretary up top, and seven Undersecretaries: National Resources and Environment; Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services; Rural Development; Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services; Food Safety; Research, Education and Economics (Science); and, Marketing and Regulatory Programs.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
In a November 7 article in The New York Times by Max Fisher and Josh Keller, the two reporters reflect upon the somber phenomenon of mass shootings in the United States. Faced with an unrelenting occurrence of such incidents, they attempt to ascertain the enabling circumstances for such atrocities. They conclude,
The only variable that can explain the high rate of mass shootings in America is its astronomical number of guns.
The top-line numbers suggest a correlation that, on further investigation, grows only clearer.
Americans make up about 4.4 percent of the global population but own 42 percent of the world’s guns. From 1966 to 2012, 31 percent of the gunmen in mass shootings worldwide were American, according to a 2015 study by Adam Lankford, a professor at the University of Alabama.
One must be wary of assessments that attribute a complex problem to only one factor, as this one does. However, the United States has 4.4 percent of the world population but 42 percent of the world's guns.
EMILY YATES FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Imagine you're being forced to flee your home. Not just your home, but your country, and not just for now, but forever.
Imagine you can only pack one carry-on sized bag, weighing no more than 50 pounds, from which you must rebuild your entire life. Everything else stays behind.
Imagine getting to your new, foreign home, only to discover that your funds are nowhere near enough to live on, your education and work skills don't translate into a local job, and you're immediately in debt to the government for the flight that brought you to safety. You have no health care, the culture you're now immersed in is entirely unfamiliar to you and every day is a struggle to adjust to a life you never thought you'd be living.
Now imagine the reason you must do this is because the United States military invaded and occupied your country, and instead of resisting, you chose to assist.
ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Things fall apart, the center cannot hold . . .
The "man's world" I grew up in is shattering into fragments of shame, contrition and desperate denial. Allegations of sexual harassment and abuse are catching up with powerful perps, sometimes decades after the fact. On Capitol Hill, we now know about a "creep list." Women shouldn't ride alone in an elevator with these guys. This is our democracy.
The only real surprise in all this is that suddenly it matters . . . that women -- as well as young males, children of both genders -- were harassed, humiliated, raped by powerful male adults: that "me too" resonates in the news. At one time, outright denial of a sexual abuse allegation wasn't even necessary because, even if it were true, so what? That was then. The idea of "a man's world" was solid and, well, boys will be boys.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Although it wasn't widely reported amid the Democratic victories in last week's off-year elections, a big win occurred in Maine for low-income individuals and households that need Medicaid. After years of Tea Party Republican Gov. Paul LePage actively opposing and preventing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion in Maine, a ballot initiative passed expanding health coverage for the poor by nearly 60 percent of the vote.
Of course, there was intractable and heated opposition to the voter proposal by LePage and his supporters. One of the arguments against the bill was that it would raise the cost of licenses for hunting and fishing, according to The American Prospect. The Prospect noted that the pro-ballot-initiative forces ran a savvy campaign to dispel misleading charges:
Mainers for Health Care, the statewide coalition that helped lead the successful yes campaign, countered the hunting and fishing license price hikes and other tall tales by relentlessly repeating a few salient data points. Medicaid expansion would create 6,000 new jobs and give the state a $500 million infusion of federal funding each year. Most importantly, the measure would provide health care to 70,000 Mainers.
To get out the vote, canvassers hit the road and knocked on more than 200,000 doors. But according to Mainers for Health Care's David Farmer, the decisive factor was the coalition's decision to deploy a "leadership team" of people who would be newly eligible for Medicaid if the measure passed.
One of the women on the "leadership team" earns "$7,000 a year from a newspaper route and sells her plasma to have enough money to take her kids to McDonald's." She also is a caregiver to her three disabled adult children.
DR. HAKIM YOUNG FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
"My family's water well has dried up," 18-year-old Surkh Gul said.
"Ours too," echoed 13-year-old Inaam.
A distressed Surkh Gul lamented, "We have to fetch water from the public well along the main road, but that water is muddy, not fit for drinking. I get bottled water for my two-year-old daughter. At least someone in the family should stay healthy."
Inaam chipped in, "Fortunately, for now, the water that we fetch from a nearby mosque is clean."
A U.S. and Afghan Geological Survey of Kabul Basin's water resources found that about half of the shallow groundwater supply wells could become dry by 2050 due to declining recharge and stream-flows under projected climate change.
EMERSON URRY OF ENVIRONEWS ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety Institute (IRSN) — but the source is still unknown. As of November 10, 2017, the manmade element has been identified in at least 28 countries.An airborne plume of radioactive ruthenium 106 from a nuclear accident was detected "in the atmosphere of the majority of European countries," from late September through mid-October, according to France's
While many news agencies are calling the cloud "harmless" and reporting the good news — that radiation levels are low and that no health consequences have been observed — radiation experts tell EnviroNews the scene may not be so peachy at ground zero where the release occurred. The question is: where exactly is ground zero?
In a report, the IRSN used wind and weather patterns, coupled with readouts from radiation monitoring stations throughout Europe, to deduce the "most plausible zone of release lies between the [Volga River] and the [Ural Mountains]." According to NPR, Jean-Christophe Gariel, Director for Health at the IRSN, said, the plume "has been traced to somewhere along the Russia-Kazakhstan border."
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
The Heartland Institute is back with a vengeance. After years of being written off by environmentalists as a fringe group pushing fringe ideas and policies, Heartland has found a love connection with officials from the Trump administration.
You would be justified if you were asking yourself, what in heaven’s name is The Heartland Institute? Sit back, you may be in for a bumpy ride!
Founded in 1984 by Joseph L. Bast and David H. Padden, Heartland has never enjoyed the praise or prestige heaped upon such conservative institutes as the Heritage Foundation and the Hoover Institution or the American Enterprise Institute. While consistently pushing a free-market, pro-privatization agenda, over the years it placed a major emphasis on climate change denial.
Nevertheless, Heartland became one of the more innovative conservative think tanks. Not because of its free-market ideology, but early on it developed a method of providing critical information to hundreds, if not thousands, of legislators – both state and national – and journalists, columnists and editorial board members.
HASSAN EL-TAYYAB FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
The escalating war of words between Trump and Kim Jong-un has put the world in more imminent danger of nuclear holocaust than at any time since the end of the Cold War. The US should revisit a vital proposal, known as the "freeze for freeze" approach, which offers the best hope for jump starting diplomacy with North Korea and turning our nation back from the brink.
Under this proposal, the US and South Korea would freeze their joint military exercises in the region in exchange for North Korea freezing its testing of ballistic missiles and nuclear warheads. This would achieve highly desirable goals for both nations, namely assurances for the US that North Korea is not making progress towards a nuclear-tipped ICBM that can reliably strike the US mainland, and assurances for North Korea that the US and South Korea are not preparing for war.
North Korea has already voiced willingness to consider a "freeze for freeze" approach. During a June 21 interview, North Korean Ambassador Key Chun-yong explained that "Under certain circumstances, we are willing to talk in terms of freezing nuclear testing or missile testing. For instance, if the American side completely stops big, large-scale military exercises temporarily or permanently, then we will also temporarily stop." Russia and Germany have also voiced support this proposal, as have American nuclear policy experts like former Secretary of Defense William Perry.
LORRAINE CHOW OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
controversial energy firm repairing Puerto Rico's hurricane-wrecked power grid, is under fresh scrutiny for charging the island's power authority hundreds of dollars more per hour than its linemen receive.Whitefish Energy, the
The New York Times reported that the tiny Montana-based company—which doesn't have many of its own employees—contracted electrical workers from Florida at rates that range from $42 to $100 per hour, with an average rate of $63. Whitefish, however, has been charging the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) $319 an hour for each worker.
The Times pointed out that $319 per hour is wildly above the industry standard, even for emergency work. Notably, the rate is 17 times higher than what it would have cost to hire a lineman in Puerto Rico.
Whitefish spokesman Chris Chiames defended its costs to the newspaper, explaining that "simply looking at the rate differential does not take into account Whitefish's overhead costs" built into the rate.