ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
The world withheld love and he went to war. He was an army of one — another army of one, laying out his plans in secret torment, plotting his "day of retribution."
"The rampage shooters see themselves as moralistic punishers striking against deep injustice," Peter Turchin wrote a year and a half ago, in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre. In his essay, ominously titled "Canaries in a Coal Mine," which was published at Social Evolution Forum, he notes the upward trajectory of mass murders. Since the '60s, they've increased more than tenfold. Something's going wrong in the world we've created.
The killers are always described as loners . . . monsters, psychopaths. They're not like us, and so the motives for the killings are sought only in the rubble of their lives — in the left-behind writings and YouTube videos, the psychological reports, the fragmentary reflections of acquaintances — and they're nothing more than sterile curiosities, with a sort of reality-TV entertainment value.
So it turns out that Elliot Rodger, the 22-year-old who killed six UC Santa Barbara students, then committed suicide, last week in Isla Vista, Calif., was shut out of human connection, nailed into a coffin of isolation. He wrote in his journal some years earlier:
"I was desperate to have the life I know I deserve; a life of being wanted by attractive girls, a life of sex and love. Other men are able to have such a life . . . so why not me? I deserve it! I am magnificent, no matter how much the world treated me otherwise. I am destined for great things."
Unlike most lonely people — but like all the others who make screaming headlines out of their loneliness — he sought a military solution to his troubles. His enemies were wrecking his life, so he armed himself and went after them. He "went to war" and, in so doing, dignified his predicament and justified his course of action. Calling it "war" is a nearly airtight justification for violence — for murder.
ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUTRHONE RESCH OF
Reposted with permission from EcoWatch.
In the ongoing war on pollution, there’s an increasingly bright light shining through the haze: solar energy.
Today, solar is providing a big boost to our environment. The 14,800 megawatts (MW) of solar currently installed in the U.S. can generate enough pollution-free electricity to displace 18 billion pounds of coal or 1.8 billion gallons of gasoline. That’s the equivalent of removing 3.5 million passenger cars off our roads and highways. For state’s trying to meet new, enhanced air quality standards, solar can be a real game changer.
Why is this so important? Because on Monday, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is set to announce new air quality standards for coal and natural gas-fired power plants.
JIM HIGHTOWER ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
It might appear that the U-S-of-A has gone bonkers. So let me clear up any confusion that you might have: Yes, it has!
Yet, it hasn't. More on that in a moment.
First, though — whether looking at the "tea party" congress critters who've swerved our nation's political debate to the hard right, or at the peacocks of Wall Street who continue to preen and profit atop the wreckage they've made of our real economy — it's plain to see that America is suffering a pestilence of nuts and narcissists in high places. These "leaders" are hell bent to enthrone themselves and their ilk as the potentates of our economic, governmental and social systems, and they are aggressively trying to snuff out the light of egalitarianism that historically has been our society's unifying force.
Bill Moyers, America's most public-spirited journalist, summarized the state of or nation in these terms: "The delusion is no longer marginal. It has come in from the fringe to sit at the seat of power." Symptoms of this national insanity include these examples:
— We can't even keep the doors of our government open. In October of last year, Washington's tea party Republican faction, unable to win the budget cuts it had demanded, threw a procedural fit to get what its acolytes wanted. Their stunt literally shut down the nation's government for 16 days and bled $24 billion from the U.S. economy. They won nothing except the widespread public scorn they earned for being self-aggrandizing political fools.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Once again, the media pundits and spineless politicians are wearing somber faces about the misogynistic Isla Vista shootings and deaths. Once again, there are the cries for gun control. However, in the flow of news cycles, the issue of taking on the gun lobby will wash away like the tide until the next white male mass killing with firearms.
The failure of US law enforcement to arrest armed and threatening militia members during the Cliven Bundy standoff - and to stop them from commandeering roads - only reinforces white male entitlement when it comes to guns. Contrast that to Occupy movement protesters who were arrested, beaten and sent to jail (consider the case of recently sentenced Cecily McMillan as an example).
Yes, there are threats to national security, but the biggest ones aren't those we spend hundreds of billions of dollars on against a relatively small number of terrorists. The most significant peril to our ability to live peaceful and comfortable lives comes from menaces that the DC politicians do little or nothing about.
You can start with allowing the NRA to impose an Ayn Rand vision of guns unlimited on the nation and its resulting toll in about 30,000 deaths a year (homicides, suicides and accidents) and the rippling psychological impact of insecurity on the nation. If al-Qaeda wanted to create the death toll of 10 9/11s each year, they might have gotten better bang for their buck by just financing the gun lobby.
Add to that the scientific validation that we may have passed the threshold on reversing impending catastrophic climate change, as DC elected officials throw campaign fundraising events while the world's environment is deteriorating rapidly. What could be a graver risk to the nation than a sixth mass extinction on this planet? Yes, we have a military-surveillance-intelligence-industrial complex that is a beast that feasts on our tax dollars - but killing civilians in a faraway land with drones is not only a hideous act of murder, it represents the triumph of the self-interest of the so-called defense establishment over what the pressing priorities of ensuring national security really are.
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
After Mitt Romney's crushing defeat in the 2012 presidential election, and the Republican Party's failure to capitalize on seemingly winnable Senate seats, Karl Rove and his financial community decided they'd had enough of flawed Tea Party-identified and backed candidates with predilections for saying outrageous ridiculous things.
In order to attain a Mitch McConnell-run Senate in January 2015, Rove decided to back so-called establishment conservatives in the 2014 primaries, that is, candidates who are far right ideologically, but wouldn't expound nonsensical gibberish when quizzed by the media. The Tea Party on the other hand, claiming that it wanted nothing more to do with McConnell and his capitulating ilk, fielded and supported more ideologically compatible candidates against Republican "establishment" figures.
Now that the dust has just about settled from the GOP primaries, Rove has built a roster of candidates he believes can win control of the Senate in November. And the Tea Party? After experiencing a number of losses in big races, many in the mainstream media, as is their wont, are writing them off, claiming that their influence has diminished.
The Wall Street Journal proclaimed, "GOP sees primaries taming the tea party." The Washington Post's conservative columnist, Jennifer Rubin, talked about "the tea party's demise," while the Post's Jaime Fuller said the Tea Party "isn't just losing; it's losing badly." Rick Sanchez, writing for Fox News Latino, said "Good Bye Tea Party, We Hardly Knew Ye." CNBC wondered if "the tea party was over" And Time magazine pointed out "GOP rolls tea party in primaries."
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Okay, okay, yes, it was an accidental error that the White House released the name of the Afghanistan CIA chief to the pool reporter for the Washington Post (WP) this weekend. According to National Public Radio (NPR), the station chief was among a list of people briefing the president while he was on a surprise Memorial Day weekend visit to the troops in that still-festering war zone:
When it realized the error, the White House issued a new list — but by then, the original had been circulated to foreign and domestic news agencies. The information was included in a pool report that was emailed to thousands of recipients Sunday night.
The White House has asked that the CIA official's name not be reported because of safety concerns; NPR and other major U.S. news organizations are abiding by that request.
When the name of a CIA station chief is sent out to thousands of recipients, it is no longer a secret, even if mainstream publications choose to go along with the charade that not publishing the name will keep it one. The reality is that although this particular leak was indeed likely made by mistake, administrations - including the current White House - leak classified information on a regular basis when it is deemed to be in their interests.
JONATHAN FRANKLIN FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Dateline: Santiago, Chile
A Chilean artist using the name “Fried Potatoes” [Papas Fritas] spent a year as he planned a unique revenge on a notorious for-profit University. Saying he was “collecting material for an art project”, the 31-year-old visual artist, snuck into a bank vault at Universidad del Mar and pilfered original copies of tuition contracts.
“Fried Potatoes” – whose real name is Francisco Tapia - then burned the university documents, making it extremely difficult for creditors to collect. “It’s over. You are all free of debt,” he exclaimed in a 5-minute video released earlier this month. Speaking to indebted students, he said, “You don’t have to pay a penny.”
Tapia’s move is just the most radical of an ongoing 3-year movement by Chilean students to reform Chile’s mediocre public education system. With monthly street marches – and four student leaders elected last November to parliament – the students have built a potent citizen’s movement rarely seen in post-Pinochet Chile.
Recently elected socialist President Michelle Bachelet supports the students and earlier this month increased the corporate tax rate to finance their main demand: free university education for all. On Wednesday, as Bachelet gave her state of the union address that outlined a multibillion dollar educational initiative, students protesting outside the congressional hall scattered ashes from the burned documents in symbolic protest against for-profit educational scams.
STEVEN JONAS MD, MPH FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Maria Bartiromo was a longtime financial market analyst for CNBC who recently left that channel and transferred over to the Fox Business Network. She appeared occasionally on CNBC's pre-market-opening show, "Squawk Box." On one of those occasions, she was engaged in a discussion about the problems that capitalism is facing. I believe that it was in the context of what one of Squawk Box's co-hosts, Andrew Ross Sorkin (also of The New York Times), was saying about the subject. In the course of it, she uttered a quite remarkable phrase, hailing what she termed "the moral imperative of capitalism."
The phrase came to mind in considering the current battle over climate change and what, if anything, to do about it. It is already affecting us. And of course, the degree of potential damage to the Earth as know it, physically, and for many of its species including ours in terms of long-term survival, is accelerating at ever-increasing rate. Indeed, there is a newly discovered major threat, the melting of a significant part of the Antarctic Ice Shelf, about which, apparently, nothing can be done. That is, in this case, even if there were a will, there is no way. For example, major parts of the State of Florida and of New York City, may well eventually be under water. Not fun, I should think. Nevertheless, there are some folks who [view this outcome from different perspective.
Of course, in the United States in particular there is a very large, very well-funded, and therefore very loud chorus that denies that global warming and one of its major consequences, climate change, is even taking place. And if it is taking place, human beings have nothing to do with it, and even if we did, doing anything to moderate the future certain changes, like enacting a "carbon tax" would just "ruin the economy" donchaknow. So where, you might be asking at this point, does the concept of "morality" come into all of this? Well, one kind of behavior that virtually everyone, atheist, theist, and everyone in-between, believes is immoral is stating as fact and truth something that you know to be false. This is where the "tobacco" in the title above comes in.
EUGENE ROBINSON ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
What's happening in the Republican primaries is less a defeat for the tea party than a surrender by the GOP establishment, which is winning key races by accepting the tea party's radical anti-government philosophy.
Anyone who hopes the party has finally come to its senses will be disappointed. Republicans have pragmatically decided not to concede Senate elections by nominating eccentrics and crackpots. But in convincing the party's activist base to come along, establishment leaders have pledged fealty to eccentric, crackpot ideas.
House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, who easily won his primary this month against a weak tea party challenger, said Tuesday that there isn't "that big a difference between what you all call the tea party and your average conservative Republican. We're against Obamacare, we think taxes are too high, we think the government's too big."
That doesn't sound so crazy. But is it reasonable for Republicans to keep voting to repeal all or part of the Affordable Care Act -- more than 50 times, so far -- knowing full well that they have zero chance of success? Does it make sense, if taxes are excessive, to refuse President Obama's invitation to begin serious talks about tax reform?
If Boehner wanted to be honest, he'd have said his party is in favor of posturing and opposed to reality.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
A week after a boisterous day of global protests against the financial exploitation of fast food workers in most nations, the rapidly growing movement spread to the annual meeting of McDonald's. With a demand to "McDouble Our Wages," an estimated 500-2000 protesters from around the Midwest gathered at the sprawling headquarter campus of the empire that Ray Kroc built (located in the western Chicago suburb of Oak Brook).
According to The Chicago Tribune, on Wednesday, "138 individuals, including 101 McDonald’s workers, were arrested for trespassing on the company’s property." Workers at the chain of low-cost non-nutritious processed food pit stops put their jobs on the line for a livable salary.
The statement accompanying McDonald's 2013 annual report boasts that while weathering some financial challenges, it generated a healthy bottom line:
Consolidated revenue increase of 2 percent (2 percent in constant currencies)
Consolidated operating income increase of 2 percent (3 percent in constant currencies)
Diluted earnings per share of $5.55, up 4 percent (4 percent in constant currencies)
Return of $4.9 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases
Barry Ritholtz, a BloombergView columnist, recorded some facts about earners making the minimum wage:
Last month, we discussed McDonald's and Wal-Mart as America’s biggest [abusers of welfare]. As it turns out, both giants are the beneficiaries of a surprising amount of federal aid: Their employees receive an inordinate amount of Medicaid, food stamps and other public assistance. This allows them to maintain very low wages, and keep profits relatively robust...