Facebook Slider
Optional Member Code
Get News Alerts!


When America's young people can't afford public colleges, the US is headed toward a third-rate future.

The Republican Party, particularly the rabid Tea Party-influenced majority in the House, is embarked on a juggernaut to take the public out of everything it can in American life, including libraries, elementary and high schools, government workers, environmental protection, even parks and parking meters.

And the movement is fast succeeding at taking the public out of higher education by cutting - most noticeably at state levels - subsidies to state and community colleges to such an extent that tuition is no longer affordable to many young Americans and their families.

A column in CNNMoney states it bluntly:

"As the out-of-pocket costs of a college education go up faster than incomes, it's pricing low and medium income families out of a college education," said Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of financial aid sites FinAid.org and FastWeb.com.

The numbers confirm what most middle class families already know - college is becoming so expensive, it's starting to hold them back.

The crux of the problem: Tuition and fees at public universities, according to the College Board, have surged almost 130% over the last 20 years - while middle class incomes have stagnated. [/indent]

The combination of privatizing public services, and thus making them less affordable to the vast majority of Americans, and lowering the wage scale for workers fortunate to have a job is making this a two-class nation.

When an increasing number of young Americans can't afford higher education, it is grievously harming the nation's future. Remember that much of our corporate intellectual property is built upon public research (just think of the Internet, which grew out of a project at the University of Illinois).

All the poobahs in DC worry so much about a hyped crisis in elementary and high school education (which has more to do with poverty than teachers), but even if magically these schools were to improve, a great many of the graduating students couldn't afford college.

Even a second grader could figure that out.


If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.

Published in EditorBlog


Awhile back, BuzzFlash posted a commentary on how Eric Cantor was, in essence, promoting rationing that would mean some seniors would die for lack of treatment under the Paul Ryan Medicare proposal.

Cantor admitted that treatment would be based on the ability to afford different levels of coverage. It was a rather shocking admission - considering that Ryan is still implausibly claiming that his Groupon voucher (coupon) approach to Medicare will not cut back on access for seniors. Yet, Cantor's rare candor went all but unnoticed by the corporate mainstream press.

The reality is that the Republicans have created the illusion that private medical insurance is universally generous and all-encompassing in its coverage. Nothing, however, could be further from the truth.

Private insurance is as varied as a used car warranty, and most Americans cannot afford medical insurance that is all-encompassing. Private insurance, except for top executives and the wealthiest, is trending toward higher deductibles, more restricted coverage and more vigorous challenge to claims.

For most people, even with private, for-profit insurance, health care is rationed right now.

Even for Medicare as we know it, there are restrictions, premiums, deductibles, co-pays, supplemental policies etc. An Associated Press article today notes that many seniors, under Medicare, cannot afford prohibitively priced life-saving drugs.

In short, there is no medical insurance in the United States that does not ration care, and Medicare, in fact, is the fairest, regardless of income. According to Paul Krugman, it is also the most inexpensive policy when it comes to what the gross national cost of insurance might otherwise be for America's seniors.

Cantor and Ryan believe that the wealthy are entitled to more extensive, life-saving and routine health care, because they have earned it.

But the health of a nation is dependent upon the health of its people, and not just its largest income earners.


If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.

Published in EditorBlog


In another indication that cutting corporate taxes and providing corporate financial incentives are not helping to resolve the unemployment problem, The New York Times reports that businesses are spending their extra dollars on software and equipment (more automation) - and hardly any on increased hiring.

Add that to a large number of corporations sitting on record profits and the continued outsourcing of jobs overseas, and it becomes clearer that the economy needs increased consumer buying power through a high-octane jobs stimulus program.

The opening paragraphs of The New York Times article speak for themselves:

Companies that are looking for a good deal aren't seeing one in new workers.

Workers are getting more expensive while equipment is getting cheaper, and the combination is encouraging companies to spend on machines rather than people.

"I want to have as few people touching our products as possible," said Dan Mishek, managing director of Vista Technologies in Vadnais Heights, Minn. "Everything should be as automated as it can be. We just can't afford to compete with countries like China on labor costs, especially when workers are getting even more expensive."

Vista, which makes plastic products for equipment manufacturers, spent $450,000 on new technology last year. During the same period, it hired just two new workers, whose combined annual salary and benefits are $160,000.

Two years into the recovery, hiring is still painfully slow. The economy is producing as much as it was before the downturn, but with seven million fewer jobs. Since the recovery began, businesses' spending on employees has grown 2 percent as equipment and software spending has swelled 26 percent, according to the Commerce Department. A capital rebound that sharp and a labor rebound that slow have been recorded only once before - after the 1982 recession.

As BuzzFlash noted the other day, US corporations are poised to make America a secondary consumer market, because there will not be sufficient numbers of citizens with significant mass buying power for their products.

"Deficit reduction" plans that increase corporate tax breaks and financial incentives are just a way of rewarding big business for automating, expanding overseas and reducing hiring here in the United States.


If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.

Published in EditorBlog


On Wednesday, I received an offer that I could refuse.

It was an email invitation from Tom Culligan, vice president of the Rev. Moon-founded Washington Times:

Please accept this as your personal invitation to join me on what promises to be one of the most exciting and enjoyable getaways in recent memory: the August 27 - September 3, 2011 CPAC cruise: North to Alaska!

Don Rumsfeld will be one of your fellow shipmates. As will NRA president David Keene, American Conservative Union chairman Al Cardenas, Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist, and, of course, yours truly....

I have to tell you: when I watched "Sarah Palin's Alaska" on my big-screen TV, I fell in love with that wild and wonderful state. And, now, I can't wait to roam its pristine terrain.

Holy wolf hunting from a helicopter with a sniper rifle! I just had to check out the cruise web site, only to find that the most inexpensive single cabin was $2,502.

Of course, there is also the Koch brothers' accommodations package for the princely sum of $6,826, but it might be worth the price just to have that mini bar and open sea verandah for relief if I had to pal around with Rummy, Grover and Ralph Reed all day.

There's nothing like sailing toward the Arctic, which is expected to dramatically accelerate its meltdown in the next few decades, with a rogue's gallery of global warming deniers and neocons.

But it's a moot point. The only way I could afford the cruise would be to find some large gold nuggets, maybe in front of Sarah Palin's window from which she can see Russia.

If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.


Published in EditorBlog


We are in the midst of a tsunami wave destroying millions and millions of jobs in America, while Washington is obsessed with cutting the deficit and Anthony Weiner's lascivious Internet "flirtations."

Bob Herbert - who is now blogging at the Policy Shop at the think tank Demos - pleads that this is the time to pull the fire alarm on unemployment:

What we have on our hands is a catastrophe. The economy has proved incapable of generating enough jobs for those who want and desperately need to work. The few jobs that are being created are mostly low-paying and part-time, with few or no benefits.

What is bizarre is the extent to which politicians have turned their backs on this issue, yammering incessantly (and ineffectively) about budget-cutting and fiscal responsibility while doing nothing, absolutely nothing, about jobs.

We're in a different era now - an era of declining living standards and a much bleaker future than Americans had become accustomed to.

Washington, DC, Herbert argues, is in a glass bubble of delusion: "President Obama referred to May's execrable jobs numbers as a bump in the road. Republicans and Democrats alike are counseling austerity, which is like weakening the water pressure of firefighters trying to contain a conflagration."

The corporate control over the debate about the future of America is imploding the US workforce, as jobs are steadily relocated offshore, automation increases business profits and the few jobs created are salaried at barely livable wages.

Our manufacturing industry long ago cratered.

If there is no awakening to this reality by those in DC, it will not be long before the US becomes a third-world market for global corporations here. There simply won't be enough consumer buying power to fuel domestic economic expansion.

But, in essence, that part of the tsunami wave has already struck our shores.


If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.

Published in EditorBlog


There is no escaping the salacious Anthony Weiner Internet scandal. Since the mainstream corporate media - for the most part - merged politics, news, entertainment, celebrity personalities and sensationalism, it's been almost impossible to have an informed national discussion on public policy.

One Weiner "confessional" news conference is worth more in advertising revenue than a year of covering our wars that have spanned a decade.

A sizeable percentage of Americans are out of work and without a safety net, Medicare and Social Security are under siege, wars are being fought that receive only sporadic coverage and the disparity in income in America is at its widest point in memory. Yet, these and other pressing issues play a distant second fiddle to a Congressman engaged in sexual titillation over the web and on the phone - however creepy and inappropriate that may be.

The Weiner affair is just the latest example of what Chris Hedges calls "spectacle" coverage superseding the dissemination of news that informs and enlightens.

Weiner - as he noted in his news conference on June 6 - will have to answer to his wife, his constituents and Congress.

The news media that is increasingly evolving into a combination of the National Enquirer, People magazine and "American Idol" has to answer to history, as America descends into a tabloid future in which only the very rich will control the mass media "news" prism.


If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.

Published in EditorBlog


New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie had an excellent helicopter adventure on the taxpayer's dime, until he reluctantly forked over the expense of the flight to his son's baseball game.

As it turns out, Christie used the state helicopter for other personal trips, and news organizations are still trying to figure out just how much New Jersey residents paid for the governor's non-state related flying.

Christie, known as an outsize figure who isn't timid about profane attacks on his opponents, called a New Jersey state assemblywoman a "jerk" for criticizing the pro-austerity governor's use of the state helicopter:

Christie lashed out at Assemblywoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle after she joined the chorus criticizing him for using state police choppers to get to his son's high school baseball games.

What really got under Christie's skin was when Vainieri Huttle pointed out that he left during the fifth inning to meet with Iowa businessmen trying to get him to run for President.

"She should really be embarrassed at what a jerk she is," Christie said shortly after he caved to public pressure and agreed to reimburse the state for the chopper rides.

Interestingly, some Republicans are trying to create a Christie for president boomlet.

You've got to wonder how a governor cutting back on those in dire need in his state can be so flippant about indulging himself with personal helicopter rides at the expense of state residents.

When will all these pro-austerity government officials start cutting back on their perks?


If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.

Published in EditorBlog


Senator Bernie Sanders (Independent-Vermont) is a long-time reader and fan of BuzzFlash.  On  June 3, his press secretary sent us the following commentary to post on BuzzFlash at Truthout. For years, Thom Hartmann, also a BuzzFlash friend, has been hosting Bernie Sanders in a Friday morning radio segment, "Brunch with Bernie." Sanders incisively states the case for a budget that benefits all Americans, but is generally ignored by the corporate mainstream media while it crowned the radical Paul Ryan as someone presenting a "bold, courgaeous" budget.

Why is the voice of Bernie Sanders not given at least equal due in the mass media?

"Instead of ending Medicare as we know it and making savage cuts to community health centers and children's health care programs, we must ask the top 2 percent of income earners, who currently pay the lowest upper-income tax rate on record, to start paying their fair share of taxes."

That is a seemingly reasonable statement by Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, in a commentary his office submitted to BuzzFlash at Truthout.

Yet, while Sanders is getting a bit more time on cable television to make his case for a budget that recognizes the need for upper-crust tax revenue increases and a reduction in the military budget, he is hardly a regular guest on national Sunday morning political talk shows. It is from these programs that much of the political punditry framework, known as "conventional wisdom," is set for public policy debates.

The corporate mainstream media generally "balances" the Ayn Rand extremism of Paul Ryan, for example, with a so-called "centrist" Democrat.

Sanders has proven himself a powerful voice for an alternative frame to look at America's budget, one that supports the services Americans want, while reducing the deficit by rolling back tax cuts for the wealthy and reining in the military-industrial complex.

In that context, Sanders is straightforward in asserting that enriching the wealthy and corporations through lower taxes is a major contributor to the high deficit:

Amazingly, while the Republican budget writers waged a vicious and unprecedented attack on the needs of working families, they do not ask the wealthiest people in this country, whose tax rates are now the lowest on record, to contribute one dime more for deficit reduction. Nor do they propose to do away with any of the loopholes that enable extremely profitable corporations (like General Electric, Bank of America, Exxon-Mobil, Chevron and many more) to pay little or no federal income taxes. Quite the contrary! The Republican budget actually provides $1 trillion more in tax breaks over the next 10 years for the very rich.

Could it be that the corporate mainstream media generally shies away from Sanders because he threatens the gluttonous incomes of the corporations and people who own most of the mass press in America?


If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.

Published in EditorBlog


BuzzFlash at Truthout has posted a lot of commentary over the years about the Republican Party's war on democracy.

It's not an exaggeration, either. All of the current efforts to reduce the number of people who vote are aimed at disenfranchising Americans who are less wealthy, less mobile, less knowledgeable about voting requirements - and, of course - the young, particularly on college campuses.

The Republicans generally believe that we are not a democracy in which everyone has a right to vote: Voting is the ultimate entitlement belonging to those who believe that this is a white, Christian nation run by people of means.

In recent coverage of Republican statewide initiatives to expand voter identification requirements, other new voter suppression strategies are being overlooked by the mainstream media. These include longer residency requirements to keep students from being able to vote on their campuses and reducing - that's right, reducing - the period for advance voting.

One of the six Republican state senators up for recall in Wisconsin adds a new wrinkle to the GOP's dim view of democracy. He wants all the public workers in his district to sleep through the election: "We've got tons of government workers in my district - tons," said GOP state Sen. Dan Kapanke. "From La Crosse to Prairie du Chien and to Viroqua and to Ontario and to Hillsboro, you can go on and on and on. We have to overcome that. We gotta hope that they, kind of, are sleeping on July 12th - or whenever the (election) date is."

BuzzFlash at Truthout imagines that Senator Kapanke was being sarcastic, but if I were a government employee in his district, I wouldn't accept any sample sleeping pills the night before the election.


If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.

Published in EditorBlog


Here's the conundrum: polls show Americans favor reducing the deficit, but also show that they don't want cuts in services or most safety net programs, including, of course, Medicare - and even Medicaid.

This paradox is, in large part, due to the successful billionaire-funded "message framing" drive about deficit reduction being essential to a sound economy, even though large corporations - which help to fund that message - most often begin with massive amounts of loans in the form of large debt.

One reader sent a commentary to Truthout the other day advocating that our political discussion should be about service cuts, not deficit reduction. Then, Americans will have to choose which services to cut, or force the politicians in DC to look to revenue enhancement strategies, such as raising taxes on the very wealthy. Accompanying this approach, as now seems part of the equation in deciding whether to wind down the war in Afghanistan, is a reduction in the US military and war budget.

By all means, let the national media and political conversation shift from deficit reduction to what services would be cut in a plan like Paul Ryan's.

The first test of that has been the implication of deficit reduction on Medicare - and the polls show that Ryan and his supporters are getting clobbered on that service cut.

Let the discussion begin. What services do you want cut?

That's the question that needs to be asked.


If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too.

Published in EditorBlog
Page 86 of 135