Facebook Slider
Optional Member Code
Get News Alerts!

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aborderdrone2US Border Patrol drone. (US Customs and Border Protection)

As BuzzFlash at Truthout has documented many a time, the US war on immigration from Mexico and Central America is cruel, political, fueled by fear of "the other" and inhumane.

BuzzFlash has also provided evidence of how the drumbeat of xenophobia against immigration by Latin Americans of limited means has resulted in large allocations of tax-payer dollars being shifted to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for "securing the Mexican border." Exactly what the hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars spent annually are "protecting" the US from is not clear, but the allocations continue to accelerate for keeping people - who are trying literally to survive - from entering the nation by crossing the Mexican border.

With all the corporate and Wall Street strident denunciation of big government, there is nothing that they love more than billions and billions of dollars in federal defense and "homeland security" spending. The military-industrial-surveillance complex excels at finding a funding spigot and turning it into a torrent. 

Incendiary language designed to create apprehension and panic further constructs the context for increased spending on the military and - in this case – halting the migration of non-whites in need. The gusher of money that results from such pandering is not often effectively spent. Even if the goals are reprehensible, the flood of money often doesn't achieve those unworthy objectives. In short, the policies - in this case denying compassionate shelter to refugees from a situation that the US has largely helped to create south of the Mexican border - are not only bad; vast amounts of taxpayer dollars are spent on enriching corporations and contractors for equipment and strategies that don't even achieve their blameworthy intended purposes.

Such is the case with US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) drones - as revealed in a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) analysis.

Published in EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aneconevery(Photo: seiuhealthcare775nw )

 

If there has been one constant over the coup d'état of the economy by the top 1%, it's been the lowering or stagnation of wages (adjusted for inflation) for most workers in the United States. One doesn't even have to footnote this trend because it is a fact, not even disputed by the cheerleaders for the Milton Friedman school of economics.

This has resulted in - again, a statistical fact - the largest income and asset gap in US history. Indeed, U.S. News and World Report posted a commentary in 2013 that declared in its headline, "Suffering Under the Weight of Inequality: Research shows that income inequality in the U.S. has hit a record high and will stifle economic growth." Written by David Bowden, cofounder of the American Sustainable Business Council, it concludes:

Inequality in the U.S. shows no sign of abating, even as the economy recovers. The decline of unions, the pace of globalization, the abundance of workers in many industries and changes in health care and taxes have combined to staunch the earning power of working Americans, even as the economy grows and productivity increases. There are few options, and none that are consistent with the political climate of the time. But the trend is reaching the point that endangers growth itself, and that should concern everyone, regardless of the size of your paycheck.

Of course, BuzzFlash would contend that there are several options for change, including a restructuring of the economic system to spread out the wealth of the nation more equitably, thus ending the economic caste of exorbitant privilege.

Published in EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aglwarm(Photo: Mikael Miettinen)

On Wednesday, January 7, The Guardian reported on a just-released analysis that warns (as stated in the article's headline), "Leave fossil fuels buried to prevent climate change: New research is first to identify which reserves must not be burned to keep global temperature rise under 2C, including over 90% of US and Australian coal and almost all Canadian tar sands."

In a stunning series of reports on Truthout, Dahr Jamail has regularly reported on the imminence of catastrophic climate failure if no dramatic steps are taken to prevent it. Other Truthout journalists have also focused on the portentous threat.

The Guardian article based on research from University College London ominously warns:

Vast amounts of oil in the Middle East, coal in the US, Australia and China and many other fossil fuel reserves will have to be left in the ground to prevent dangerous climate change, according to the first analysis to identify which existing reserves cannot be burned.

The new work reveals the profound geopolitical and economic implications of tackling global warming for both countries and major companies that are reliant on fossil fuel wealth. It shows trillions of dollars of known and extractable coal, oil and gas, including most Canadian tar sands, all Arctic oil and gas and much potential shale gas, cannot be exploited if the global temperature rise is to be kept under the 2C safety limit agreed by the world's nations. Currently, the world is heading for a catastrophic 5C of warming and the deadline to seal a global climate deal comes in December at a crunch UN summit in Paris.

One can only imagine the public relations consultants for the fossil fuel industry in full crisis management mode, preparing propaganda to debunk a credible study.

Published in EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

fds(Photo: USDAgov)

The possibility of implosion persistently looms over the US economy, but a moral disintegration of the nation has been simmering for decades.

The continued reduction in food stamp support is the latest addition to the dismantling of a social safety net that fulfills an ethical obligation to individuals in the US. That obligation is based on the reality that the current financial system is structured with incentives to ensure that full employment is never achieved. Large-scale unemployment is necessary in order to keep corporate profits high by keeping the costs of labor low.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities predicts that in the government's fiscal year of 2016, it is possible that one million adults (without dependent children) who do not have jobs will have lost their food stamp benefits. These are individuals in extreme need of supplemental food support for survival: 

Unemployed, nondisabled childless adults on SNAP [the food stamp program] tend to be very poor. USDA data show that while these individuals participate in SNAP their gross income averages 19 percent of the poverty line - about $2,200 per year for a household of one in 2014 - compared to gross income of 58.5 percent of the poverty line for the average SNAP household overall…. Some 96 percent of them live in households below 100 percent of the poverty line.  

Some 40 percent of this vulnerable population are women. Almost one-third are over age 40. Among those who report their race, about half are white, a third are African American, and a tenth are Hispanic. Half have only a high school diploma or GED.  

The Center estimates that new regulations will result in a loss of $150-$200 a month in food assistance for individuals who have total incomes of just over $2,000 a year.

Published in EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aenoughblacklives(Photo: Light Brigade/ Black Lives Matter)

Nationally known progressive newscaster, author and daily Truthout commentator Thom Hartmann wrote some time ago about how George Zimmerman's vigilante shooting of Trayvon Martin (for walking while Black) represented the legacy of slave patrols.

Hartmann wrote on Truthout in July of 2013,

George Zimmerman kept close watch over his neighborhood.

When Black men walked or even drove through the area, he alerted the police, over and over and over again.

Finally, exasperated that "they always" got away, he went out on a rainy night armed with a loaded gun and the Stand Your Ground law, looking for anybody who should not be in his largely White neighborhood.

The South has a long history of this sort of thing. Today they’re called Neighborhood Watches. They used to be called Slave Patrols.

A recent BuzzFlash at Truthout commentary contended:

The role of most large urban police forces that aggressively patrol poor communities of color is to remove the "blight" of people of color in poverty by arrest and imprisonment - particularly black males and Latinos, and increasingly women of color. 

Published in EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

abirdhome(Photo: DavidPronk)

In 2014, BuzzFlash posted periodic commentaries on a national trend of cities prohibiting organizations and individuals from feeding the homeless. Basically, real estate developers and people living in comfortable neighborhoods regard people who are homeless as little more than urban blight, and so municipalities have increasingly been passing ordinances that outlaw providing food to individuals who cannot afford housing. A number of different nefarious strategies have also been implemented by cities to make homelessness illegal in certain areas. It is not surprising that Glenn Beck's right-wing website, The Blaze, touts the "Top 10 Anti-Homeless Measures Used in the United States."

Unfortunately, the last days of 2014 indicate that the war against the homeless will continue on into 2015. During the holiday season - the alleged period of caring, love and empathy - the city officials of Roseville, California (located just northeast of Sacramento), threatened to take action against an organization with the seasonally appropriate name of "What Would Jesus Do" for offering food to homeless individuals.

According to the December 28 The Sacramento Bee, 

For the homeless feeding organization called What Would Jesus Do, it is an act of benevolent defiance.

After a 31/2-month absence, the group is again serving breakfast pastries, hot chocolate and coffee, canned goods and additional staples to homeless and other disadvantaged people at Roseville’s Saugstad Park on Sunday mornings. Volunteers were out once more in the chilly air Sunday after resuming the park program on Dec. 21.

Just four days before Christmas, however, Roseville City Hall was not happy.  

Published in EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

obamasantaObama has fostered an economy that showers the rich with gifts. (Photo: Carlos)

The stock market just hit a record high on December 22; the gross domestic product (GDP) is growing at its fastest rate in more than a decade; and the top 1% has received more than 95% of the economic gains since 2008, according to at least two studies (previously discussed on BuzzFlash).

Moreover, these factors, among others, also facilitate an even wider income divide - something akin to an economic Grand Canyon. This is like the jingling of Christmas bells to the plutocracy; it means more concentrated wealth and cheaper labor (because of the increased number of people willing to accept lower wages in order to have employment). The decreasing domestic (and global) labor costs, in turn, increase corporate profits.

In short, the richest have been getting steadily, inordinately wealthier during the two terms of the Obama administration....

If Ronald Reagan were president now, the Republicans would be worshiping him as a God sent down to earth to lead Milton Friedman capitalism into a gilded age of oligarchical triumph - coronating him with a laurel wreath as if he were a Caesar of mammon.

What could be more cheery for millionaires and billionaires than becoming even more bloated with money during this holiday season? They should be hailing Obama as Santa Claus for the well heeled, instead of portraying him as some sort of cross between Lenin and the Antichrist.

Published in EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

acolbertwhcorr

Other columnists have remarked on the masterful run of Stephen Colbert as a bloviating blowhard based on Bill O'Reilly, who drenched right-wing zealotry in wry, undercutting irony. With the campy, rousing grand finale of "The Colbert Report" last Thursday, the former "Daily Show" reporter - who will now be the next host of "Late Night" will reportedly jettison his corrosive imitation of O'Reilly and be reincarnated as Stephen Colbert, bedtime talk show host.

Colbert may have indefatigably skewered the pomposity of right wing media pundits, but like all brilliant comedians he never was above indulging in comic shtick that could be traced back to the silliness of vaudeville. His "slaying" of Grimy - a Halloween costume incarnation of the grim reaper - before a non-functioning green screen in the last episode of his show was testament to Colbert's occasional willingness to elicit laughter even if cheezy, in the manner of Johnny Carson's tacky but humorous skits.

Nonetheless, Colbert brought a civility to humor that was distinct. His frequent author interviews were as waggish as they were revealing - and a forum for a much under-appreciated skill in the United States today: literacy. He was always the wittiest person on the set, but also simultaneously a calculatingly caricature. How many people can eviscerate their own assertion of ludicrous right-wing arguments with such unwavering aplomb?

Published in EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

astopexec(Photo: Luke)

 

A morbidly twisted controversy is being played out over so-called "botched" executions, in which condemned men and women endure prolonged deaths due to experimentation with lethal drugs. FOX News jumped on the bandwagon of scorning "inefficient" state-sanctioned killings with this headline, "Botched execution of Oklahoma killer raises questions about new 3-drug lethal injection protocol."

FOX joined other national news outlets in detailing the gruesome details of how Clayton Lockett died in April of a heart attack after an ad hoc three-drug combination failed to render Lockett unconscious:

A botched execution using a new drug combination left a convicted killer writhing and clenching his teeth on the gurney Tuesday, leading Oklahoma prison officials to halt the proceedings before the inmate's eventual death from a heart attack....

Published in EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

acuba(Photo: flippinyank)

An archaic relic of the Cold War - propped up by a literally dying contingent of pro-Batista US citizens of Cuban descent in Florida and conservatives who still think there is a Soviet Union - is about to be demolished by the Obama administration. As The New York Times headline declares: "Obama Announces U.S. and Cuba Will Resume Diplomatic Relations."

Amid ruinous and deadly US foreign policy, the diplomatic shunning of Cuba - along with a congressional boycott of the nation - stands as a singular act of international stupidity. The United States loyally props up dictators, tyrants and neoliberal clones in Latin and South America, often helping maneuver them into power. (This is happening relatively less under Obama, but let's not forget official State Department policy such as his administration's recognition of the Honduran military coup.) Moreover, the US has used a deadly war on drugs to secure the expansion of US-based corporations south of the border.

The State Department and Congress have long been holdouts in politically recognizing the island nation of Cuba, with a population of 11.25 million. European nations have had both diplomatic and economic relations with Havana for years, as does Canada.

Published in EditorBlog
Page 7 of 133