EditorBlog (937)
John Kerry's Senate Seat May Be the Real Target of the GOP Benghazi Suicide Squad
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
John Kerry
On Tuesday night, Rachel Maddow laid out a compelling narrative for speculation that has been caroming around the Internet: why John McCain, Lindsay Graham and their new member of the three amigos -- Senator Kelly Ayotte (R- NH), replacing Joe Lieberman – are so virulently attacking Susan Rice. Is it to give the GOP a shot at picking up John Kerry's senate seat in Massachusetts?
To put it quite simply, if Obama backs down from appointing Rice due to the Republican Benghazi brigade, conventional wisdom has it that he is likely to appoint John Kerry to become Secretary of State. If that were to be the case, Kerry's seat would become vacant. A temporary replacement would be selected by Democratic Governor Deval Patrick (Kennedy family favorite Paul Kirk was chosen as a place holder senator after Kennedy's death), but the seat would then be contested in a special election.
Enter Republican Scott Brown, who remains personally popular in Massachusetts after being dislodged from Ted Kennedy's former senate seat by Democrat (now Senator-elect) Elizabeth Warren in the November election. Warren fought hard to defeat Brown, who voted with the GOP basically whenever they needed him, but tossed a few social progressive bones out to make him acceptable to many Massachusetts Democratic voters. Against a candidate with less savvy, gumption, campaign contributions and progressive credentials than Warren, Brown could conceivably pick up the seat presently held by Kerry.
Yesterday, BuzzFlash at Truthout dissected the hypocrisy of the Republican three amigos unrelenting buzz saw attack on Susan Rice. On Thursday, we will further explore the GOP double standard in relation to Colin Powell's infamous "yellow cake" UN speech that gave false cover for launching the war on Iraq.
GOP Senators Embraced Condi Rice as Secretary of State After She Ignored 9/11 Warnings, But Pummel Susan Rice
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Susan Rice
NBC reports today that "GOP senators not satisfied with Rice explanation of Benghazi aftermath",
and after a "candid" meeting with Ambassador Rice, McCain claims that he is "significantly troubled" with her answers.
BuzzFlash has been around for 12 years, and we remember quite well that when Condi Rice was George W. Bush's National Security Advisor, both she and Bush ignored warnings of possible impending Al Qaeda hijackings in the US. This, we remind you, was prior to the fateful day of 9/11, as a result of which more than 3000 people have died due to the attacks on the Twin Towers.
For a while after 9/11, Bush and Rice denied receiving any alerts. Then, after months passed and a pre-September 11th CIA intelligence briefing was disclosed that warned Al Qaeda was determined to strike in the US, Bush and Rice changed their tune by parsing their responses to indicate that they were never informed of hijackings that would be flown into buildings. This became the so-called rationale for their not doing anything to prevent the attacks -- nothing at all.
The unearthed memo, which was the most sensational made public (while other warnings were revealed even in the relatively whitewashed 9/11 hearings), was dated August 6, 2001. It was the daily presidential intelligence briefing and was seen by both Bush (who blew off the CIA liaison who presented it to him at Bush's ranch in Texas) and Rice.
Journalist Kurt Eichenwald wrote an op-ed in the September 10, 2012 New York Times that reveals how the White House was virtually defiant in not taking any preventive action against Al Qaeda prior to 9/11. Eichenwald received access to written warnings in the hands of the White House that preceded the August 6 memo:
(Photo: Wikipedia)
Most American Voters Elected a Democratic House, But We Got a Tea Party Congress
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT 
BuzzFlash isn't the first site to note that approximately 53,952,000 Democratic votes were cast for congressional representatives, while only about 53,403,000 votes were cast for House Republicans. (Curiously enough that is about the same popular vote victory that Al Gore won in the 2000 election: 540,000 votes.)
Yet, the Boehner/Cantor Tea Party tilt remains in the House of Representatives.
As PolicyMic explains:
Republican gerrymandering of electoral districts isn’t as sexy to kick up a fuss about, nor does it make for as good memes, but it’s safe to say that elaborate redistricting helped the party to win their current House majority. And to win by redistricting, looks an awful lot like cheating. Professor Geoffrey Stone emphasized that:
“Although the Republicans won 55% of the House seats, they received less than half of the votes for members of the House of Representatives. Indeed, more than half-a-million more Americans voted for Democratic House candidates than for Republicans House candidates. There was no split-decision. The Democrats won both the presidential election and the House election. But the Republicans won 55% of the seats in the House.
(Photo: Wikipedia)
Romney's Final Vote Tally Likely to be 47 Percent: Divine Justice
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT 
Yes, provisional (and other) ballots are still being counted in the presidential election up to and after Thanksgiving.
And it appears likely, according to several sources (including post-election late vote count tabulator David Wasserman , Greg Sargent of the Washington Post and Kos ), that Romney will end up with a rounded 47 percent of the vote. That is because the vast majority of the late vote count (irrelevant to the outcome, but vital for bragging and irony rights) is coming from Democratic leaning states.
So it appears that the odds are that the man, Mitt Romney, who openly expressed his disdain for 47 percent of United States citizens (including those receiving Social Security and Medicare) will end up with the numerical percentage of the vote that will come to define him politically in years to come: 47 percent.
(Photo: Ho John Lee)
Romney Makes Scrooge Look Like a Philanthropist as He Charges That Obama Bought Election With Gifts to 47 Percent
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT 
Talk about living in a bubble, Romney who ran his election with the primary goal of making the top .01 percent even richer says Obama bought off the 47 percent of the population that Mitt dismissed as unimportant to him.
According to the Los Angeles Times:
Mitt Romney said Wednesday that his loss to President Obama was due in large part to his rival's strategy of giving "gifts" during his first term to three groups that were pivotal in the results of last week's election: African Americans, Latinos and young voters.
"The Obama campaign was following the old playbook of giving a lot of stuff to groups that they hoped they could get to vote for them and be motivated to go out to the polls, specifically the African American community, the Hispanic community and young people," Romney told hundreds of donors during a telephone town hall Wednesday. "In each case they were very generous in what they gave to those groups."
Romney's frank analysis echoed his secretly taped comments at a May fundraiser, where he told a small group of donors that 47% of the electorate was unlikely to vote for him because they paid no income taxes and were dependent on government. It followed his running mate Paul D. Ryan's assertion that Obama's win stemmed from turnout among "urban" voters.
This, of course, is a meme that plays right into the phrase Romney derisively used in the campaign: "trickle down government." But plays on the stereotype of black politicians paying "street money" for votes. The LA Times notes that Romney's assertion was ironically flawed:
(Photo: Women Voters of California)
Did Cantor Intimidate FBI in Petraeus Affair to Support FOX Benghazi Propaganda Campaign?
Seal of the FBIEric Cantor's Petraeus October Surprise Failed as FBI Stood Firm
Eric Cantor: His October Surprise FailedBush Got More Mormon Votes Than Mitt: The Saints Didn't Come Marching in for Romney
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
(Photo: More Good Foundation)As The Hill and some other news outlets have reported, Mitt Romney received fewer votes from members of the Church of the Latter Day Saints than Bush. It wasn't a landslide difference: 80% of the Mormon vote went to Bush in 2004; 78% to Romney in 2012. But even if the figure is subject to a statistical margin of error (based on exit polling), it does make one wonder why Mitt didn't get closer to 100% of the Mormon vote.
Since Roosevelt, No GOP Presidential Campaign Has Won Vote Without a Bush or Nixon on Ticket: Jeb Bush 2016? Ugh!
Jeb BushTammy Baldwin Elected to Senate on Merit, Breaking the Glass Ceiling for Lesbians and Gays
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT 
Personally, I have never given a hoot about whether anyone is gay, lesbian, bi-sexual or transgender. Heck, I don't witness the sexual lives of other people, so why should I care about who a person does what with in terms of their bodies? It's a private preference issue performed in private.
So the election of Tammy Baldwin to the United States Senate to fill the seat vacated by Democrat Herbert Kohl, a wealthy scion of a retail magnate family, made history on Tuesday because she is not only the first openly lesbian US Senator, she will be the first openly gay US Senator (although there are reportedly at least a couple closeted LGBT senators, just recall Larry "Widestance" Craig).
Baldwin beat a Wisconsin landmark, former long-serving Governor Tommy Thompson to represent the Badger State in the senate. But her mind wasn't on breaking a barrier, it was on serving the people:
(Photo: Wikipedia)

