Skip to content Skip to footer
Judge Dismisses Charges Against Blackwater Guards Involved in Iraq Massacre
A federal judge in Washington

Judge Dismisses Charges Against Blackwater Guards Involved in Iraq Massacre

A federal judge in Washington

A federal judge in Washington, DC on Thursday dismissed criminal charges against five Blackwater guards involved in the massacre of 14 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in September 2007, an incident that led to a public outcry over the government’s increasing reliance on contractors in the battlefield.

US District Court Judge Ricardo Urbina ruled that federal prosecutors improperly used statements the men gave to State Department investigators under a promise of immunity to secure indictments against them.

“In their zeal to bring charges…in this case, the prosecutors and investigators aggressively sought out statements the defendants had been compelled to make to government investigators in the immediate aftermath of the shooting and in the subsequent investigation,” Urbina wrote in a 90-page opinion.

“In so doing, the government’s trial team repeatedly disregarded the warnings of experienced, senior prosecutors, assigned to the case specifically to advise the trial team on [legal] issues, that this course of action threatened the viability of the prosecution. The government used the defendants’ compelled statements to guide its charging decisions, to formulate its theory of the case, to develop investigatory leads, and ultimately to obtain the indictment[s] in the case.

“The explanations offered by prosecutors and investigators in an attempt to justify their actions and persuade the court that they did not use the defendants’ compelled testimony were all too often contradictory, unbelievable and lacking in credibility. In short, the government has utterly failed to prove that it made no impermissible use of the defendants’ statements or that such use was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the court must dismiss the indictment against all of the defendants.”

Urbina did not rule on the merits of the case. Still, the Iraqi government expressed outrage at his decision to dismiss criminal charges against the guards.

On Friday, Ali al-Dabbagh, a spokesman for the Iraqi government, said the government would pursue criminal “proceedings against Blackwater in Iraqi courts to prosecute the company and will preserve the rights of Iraqi citizens, of the victims and their families affected by this crime.”

He added that an investigation conducted by “by specialized Iraqi authorities unequivocally found that the Blackwater guards committed murder and broke use-of-force rules when there was no threat requiring the use of force.”

At the time of the Nisour Square shooting, which federal investigators said was unprovoked, Blackwater had a contract to provide security to the State Department in Iraq.

The guards, who were escorting State Department diplomats en route to a meeting, claimed they were being fired upon by insurgents and responded with machine guns, a sniper rifle and grenade launchers. An investigation determined there was no evidence to support Blackwater’s version of events that unfolded. Seventeen Iraqis were killed in the massacre and 27 were wounded. The guards were held accountable for 14 of the deaths.

The guards—Paul Slough, Evan Liberty, Dustin Heard, Donald Ball and Nicholas Slatten—were indicted on manslaughter and weapons charges in December 2008. A sixth guard, Jeremy Ridgeway, pled guilty to killing one Iraqi civilian and wounding another. He was expected to testify against his former colleagues.

Earlier this month, the Department of Justice filed a motion asking Urbina to close the court proceedings in the case to the public, saying classified information may be disclosed. The trial was scheduled to begin in January.

In a statement, Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said, “we’re still in the process of reviewing the decision and considering our options.”

Ali-Dabbagh said the Iraqi government would urge the Justice Department to appeal Urbina’s ruling.

Explosive Allegations

Last August, a Blackwater employee and a former ex-Marine employed by the company in a security capacity said in sworn affidavits filed in federal court in Virginia that Prince may have murdered or assisted in the murder of individuals who were cooperating with federal law enforcement authorities investigating the company.

The explosive allegations, which included claims the company was involved in the distribution of controlled substances, tax evasion and child prostitution, were made in a civil lawsuit filed against Prince, Blackwater and the firm’s subsidiaries. It charges the company with Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) violations.

The complaint, filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) on behalf of Iraqi civilians who were wounded and others whose family members were killed in the Baghdad massacre, alleged that Blackwater “created and fostered a culture of lawlessness amongst its employees, encouraging them to act in the company’s financial interests at the expense of innocent human life.”

Improperly Obtained Contracts

In July 2008, the Inspector General of the Small Business Administration (SBA) released a report that said Blackwater misrepresented the size of its firm so it could receive more than $100 million in small business contracts from the federal government.

The report said the mercenary outfit obtained a total of 39 contracts intended for small businesses with annual revenues of $6.5 million between 2005 and 2007. The report noted that Blackwater’s revenue surpassed $200 million for those years.

Blackwater “obtained a total of 33 contracts during Fiscal Years 2005 through 2007, totaling $2,188,620, which may have involved misrepresentations to obtain the contract.”

The report also found that “it is possible that misrepresentations took place” on the remaining six contracts, totaling $107,311,356.”

Moreover, the Department of Defense wrongfully awarded Blackwater aviation contracts worth $107 million. That contract was earmarked for companies with annual revenues of less than $25 million or less than 1,500 employees, the report said.

The report was prepared at the request of Congressman Henry Waxman, who at the time was the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Waxman sent a letter in March 2008 to Steven Preseton, the administrator of the Small Business Administration.

According to a memo issued by Waxman to Oversight Committee members, “The key issue… was whether personnel hired by Blackwater to provide security services for the Department of State (DOS) and other agencies were Blackwater employees . . . or independent contractors.”

“In claiming it was a small business, Blackwater argued that 1,000 security personnel it provided under the State Department’s $1.2 billion Worldwide Personal Protective Service (WPPS) contract were independent contractors,” Waxman’s memo says. “The [Small Business Administration Inspector General] reports that Blackwater claimed that it “had little or no knowledge of the activities of the security personnel performing the contract and exercised little or no supervision over these personnel once they were deployed.”

To date, Blackwater has received more than $1.2 billion in government contracts.

Blackwater, now known as Xe, has also been under scrutiny over recent revelations that the CIA hired the firm after 9/11 to lead an assassination program targeting al-Qaeda leaders.

In an exclusive interview with Vanity Fair, former Blackwater chief executive Erik Prince said he was working for the federal government up until two months ago.

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $16,000 before midnight to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?