Democratic Candidates Unload on Bush

Sunday, 18 May 2003 06:28 by: Anonymous
By Ronald Brownstein
LA Times

Sunday 18 May 2003

At a union gathering in Des Moines, seven of the nine presidential hopefuls play down their differences and strike a populist tone.

DES MOINES Seven of the nine Democratic presidential candidates muted their differences with each other and sharply criticized President Bush's record on the economy, health care, judicial appointments and homeland security at a town meeting here Saturday sponsored by a powerful union.

Unlike the heated recent debate in South Carolina, the seven Democrats two candidates were unable to attend almost entirely avoided challenging each other in their joint appearance before nearly 1,000 members of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, or AFSCME, who gathered from around the country.

Instead, the candidates competed to deliver the most enthusiastic denunciations of Bush, the Republican Party and big corporations, usually in pointed populist terms.

"The Republicans and George Bush, they honor wealth," said Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina. "We honor the work that produces wealth."

The most engaging moment in the session, which lasted 2 1/2 hours, came when a New York City Fire Department emergency medical technician who responded to the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center accused Bush of failing to sufficiently fund homeland security and asked the candidates what they would do differently.

The seven candidates on the stage dramatically rose to applaud the questioner, Joseph Conzo. They then repeatedly charged that Bush has left America "vulnerable to future attacks because this administration has not done its job and has not increased our ability to have homeland security," as Rep. Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri put it.

Florida Sen. Bob Graham delivered the most searing indictment, repeating his recent charges that the war in Iraq has diverted America's attention from the terrorist threat.

"What this administration has done is they have conducted an ideological war in Iraq where they have not found the weapons of mass destruction upon which it was predicated, and at the same time they have stopped the war against terror," Graham said. "We have let Al Qaeda off the hook."

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, the most prominent opponent of the Iraq war among the leading Democrats, echoed Graham. "Everybody is glad to see Saddam gone," he said. "But the truth is it is a diversion. We are not safer today than we were before Saddam Hussein left."

Sen. John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, who was scheduled to deliver a commencement address in New Hampshire on Saturday, addressed the Iowa session later by satellite. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, who does not campaign on Saturday in observance of the Jewish Sabbath, appeared in a recorded interview.

From the pledge by Gephardt to pursue an international minimum wage, to the promise by Edwards to give workers greater representation on corporate boards, to the call by dark-horse Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio to repeal the North American Free Trade Agreement, the candidates wooed the crowd of activists by highlighting the most liberal aspects of their agenda.

With nearly 1.3 million members, AFSCME is one of the largest and most politically effective unions in the AFL-CIO.

The union's early endorsement of Bill Clinton in the 1992 Democratic primary, when most industrial unions were supporting liberal Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, was a key to Clinton's victory.

The union hopes to endorse a candidate in this race by next fall; the session in Iowa, home of the first caucus in the Democratic race next January, was billed as the opening of that endorsement process.

Gerald McEntee, AFSCME president, opened Saturday's meeting with a stemwinder against Bush that was repeatedly interrupted by standing ovations.

"While the president is trying to rebuild Iraq, whether it's bridges, tunnels or giving them the money [for] providing universal health care in Iraq, we say to the president and all the members of that party that they are neglecting the basic needs here in Iowa and across the country," McEntee said to loud applause.

Moments later, McEntee, referring to Bush, loudly declared: "He's got to go" and the crowd of union activists responded with a chant of "gotta go."

That set the pattern for the morning, as the audience cheered loudly each time the Democrats denounced Bush's record and jeered each mention of the president and other Republicans such as Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

It was telling that when the candidates delivered their opening statements, the audience gave standing ovations only to two long-shot contenders with the most unabashedly liberal messages.

First the audience rose for Kucinich, who pledged to carry out government-funded universal health care and taunted Bush over the failure to find conclusive evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Moments later, the crowd also gave a standing ovation to the Rev. Al Sharpton when he echoed McEntee in chiding Bush for promising U.S. money to rebuild Iraq.

"What about the 50 states we already occupy?" Sharpton said to loud applause.

After the event, union officials said that Kucinich, Sharpton and then Gephardt received the highest ratings from a focus group of AFSCME Iowa members who watched the event while a pollster measured their reactions. Kerry appeared after testing was completed but also received an enthusiastic response.

The candidates spent much of the unusually lengthy session politely discussing an array of domestic issues; the temperate tone may have reflected the criticism several received from others in the party for jabbing each other more sharply in South Carolina this month.

Indeed, the audience rose in applause when the union's secretary-treasurer, William Lucy, urged the candidates to "fight the enemy and not each other."

None of the contenders at any point seriously challenged the predominantly liberal views in the audience; rather they stressed the aspects of their agenda likely to appeal most to the crowd.

On health care, for instance, Gephardt said his plan would provide states grants of at least $50 billion to offset their costs in providing health care to their employees, most of them AFSCME members.

Kucinich touted his plan for a government-run single-payer universal health-care system to be funded by a new 7.7% payroll tax on employers. Edwards, while offering no specifics on how he would expand coverage, promised to try to restrain health-care costs by taking on what he called "big insurance companies, big HMOs [and] big pharmaceutical companies."

Edwards notably did not reprise his criticism in South Carolina that Gephardt's plan would provide unjustified tax breaks to corporations while revoking elements of the Bush tax cut that benefited middle-income families.

Several of the Democrats also pledged expensive new initiatives to help states struggling with budget deficits that experts say are the deepest since World War II another issue of great concern to the union.

Go to Original

Former Governor of Vermont is Organizationally Savvy, Aggressive 

May 7   Even if you follow politics closely, you probably didn t notice that the Howard Dean boomlet faded a few weeks ago. The theory was that no anti-war candidate and Dean is one can survive the fall of Baghdad and the rise of a president playing Top Gun on an aircraft carrier. Well, Democratic insiders (and their media cousins) may think that Dean s a non-starter in the race for their party s 2004 presidential nomination. I don t agree. In fact, the former governor of Vermont is still a man to watch, if not the man to beat.

WHY? A FEW reasons. For one, Dean has made himself the organizing principal pun intended of these earliest innings of the campaign. As they say in baseball, he s the straw that stirs the drink. He has the august Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts reacting to his moves (and elevating Dean by attacking him). Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri unveiled a sweeping healthcare proposal, playing to an issue that Dean, a doctor, hoped to own.

And Dean s dovish views and chesty demeanor are defining the debate, drawing reactions from other contenders. His biggest applause line is: I represent the democratic wing of the Democratic Party! Sen. Bob Graham of Florida had a retort last week in South Carolina: I represent the electable wing of the Democratic Party! In a TV debate there, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut added his own reaction, which was that no candidate who wasn t strong on defense could defeat George W. Bush. Translation: That means you, Howard.

Another reason Dean still bears watching is his organizational savvy. Being an outsider, yet one with sterling connections and technical skill, is a good combination. He is running a relatively lean but efficient operation, with knowledgeable veterans (Steve McMahon and Joe Trippi from D.C.) teaming up with Ben & Jerry types from Vermont and elsewhere.

So far, Dean s outfit is the most adept at using the Internet, which is to the 2004 campaign what cable TV was to 1992 and direct-mail to 1980 the new Best Practice for reaching and motivating voters.

This week, the Dean campaign s grass-roots enthusiasts will put themselves on display, gathering in about 250 Meetups generated through the Web site of the same name. These events turn traditional organizing on its head: The campaign people go to the meeting, they don t put it together.

A tiny but revealing indicator of organizational skill: the speed with which the allegedly inexperienced Dean campaign responded to attacks during the TV debate in South Carolina. They matched the top-shelf and perhaps top-heavy Kerry campaign stride for stride in rushing printed rebuttals into the press room during the event. Kerry has a Noah s Ark campaign, a top Dean lieutenant told me in South Carolina. They ve got two of everything.

Then there s the candidate himself. Howard Dean, at least as a candidate, is a shark in Land s End clothing. He is always moving forward and always on the attack. Most of his rivals genuinely loathe him at this point, but Dean doesn t seem to care. He s looking to inspire voters, and thinks his combative style is what they want. He thinks that Democrats want some anger in their candidate to confront Bush s Red State triumphalism. Dean appears to draw inspiration from the cutthroat side of the Kennedy legacy, Bobby and Jack in particular. Their rhetoric soared and their ideals were noble, but their tactics were tough. When they wanted to dismiss someone as a nonentity, they called him a nice man.

Dean is not a nice man. His Web page, for example, derides Kerry as The Anointed One. In the latest polls, he and Kerry are running neck and neck in New Hampshire, where only one of them will survive the primary next year.

Finally, there s the question of the war. The swift military victory in Iraq, so the argument goes, made Dean look bad, or at least irrelevant. The American people generally back President Bush s strategy, which is to drain terrorism-producing swamps by forcing changes in the corrupt and brutal regimes that control them. Even so, Dean continues to insist that Saddam Hussein was not a threat to America, and that attacking his regime wasn t necessarily in our interest.

For now, it seems like a losing argument for Dean to make. But, in politics, a week is a year and a year is a lifetime. No one knows what Iraq will look like a year from now. No one knows where the war on terrorism is headed. And at the grassroots of the Democratic Party, there remains deep, Dean-like skepticism about the war in Iraq and military answers in general.

Remember: To win the Democratic nomination, you need only Democratic votes and plugged-in Democrats at that. In that small universe, you don t have to play the role of Top Gun to win.

Last modified on Monday, 21 April 2008 13:39